existed only to serve their masters
Many slaves experienced harsh and dehumanizing conditions. While some may have found moments of joy or resistance, it is inaccurate to characterize their overall experience as happy. Slavery was a system of forced labor that inflicted widespread physical, emotional, and psychological suffering on those who endured it.
Life for "house slaves" was easier for slaves working on plantations. The house slaves thought than they were better than the slaves on the plantations.
there was a house slaves' and the field slaves';)that's all i know of.
Yes, enslaved people were forced to mine in various societies throughout history, such as in ancient Rome and Greece, as well as during the transatlantic slave trade in the Americas. They were subjected to harsh conditions and exploitation while mining for resources like gold, silver, and other valuable minerals.
I'm sure there were SOME slaves who were treated nicely
A movie about slaves beig happy to serve their wealthy masters
#
No, they weren't. Slaves were portrayed as partners and everyone was happy.
super
yes they were very happy for there master to be set free from slavery
f*ck them so they will be happy
No. Your question smacks of the Jim Crow view of slavery and that was slaves were happy to be slaves. That is not true. When another person owns a person as property that is wrong.
Because of their nature, African Americans were regarded as being meant to be slaves.
abraham was very happy to free the slaves.
A movie about slaves being happy to serve their wealthy masters
It was terrible. Women were not considered human, and slaves were treated like trash. But the slaves didn't care, they were happy, they got food,water, and something to do.