Intel processors can be purchased new from the Intel website. Used or remanufactured units can be purchased online through resellers or auctions. Office supply stores like Staples and Office Depot sell certain types of Intel processors but their online site will have more choices.
Obviously different companies, but besides that AMD processors mu go in motherboard that use an AMD socket and Intel processors must go into an Intel based socket. Intel processors seem to be a bit more expensive but Intel is on top with the newest technology. Many AMD "fans" would argue this.
It would be impossible to list every single processor model and stepping produced by Intel.
Intel is the leading brand in CPU processors.
It all depends on the specific CPU you are talking about. There are hundreds of processors made by both of these companies. There is no good answer to this.AnswerIn my experience, Intel is WAY better than AMD. My roomates have AMD's and their not impressed. Anybody that speaks of their Intel is typically happy. Intel dose not use a much power as AMD. So Intel for laptops and AMD for desktops. All in all they are both good
The rough equivalent would be the Intel Atom CPU, a low-power, low-performance single-core microprocessor used in netbooks and supermicro PC's.
Linux can be run on a variety of processors, including several that have been used for desktop systems. The most notable would be Intel and AMD x86 processors, as well as PowerPC processors (used in older Macs. ) Other processors used in desktop systems now or in the past and supported by Linux include Motorola 68k processors, Alpha processors, MIPS processors, and ARM processors.
I personally would chose the 1.5 Intel core duo because 2 processors can handle twice the jobs even though its only 1.5 that will still be better than the AMD. Are you sure the AMD Doesnt have 2 processors???
Price VS performance ratio, as AMD is alittle cheaper than Intel CPU's. Sure you get all the fancy bells and whistles from a Intel CPU but, I always prefered AMD for some reason
They are two different companies. Cyrix is a smaller company, their processors are not as performant as Intel ones, however they would exponse exactly the same set of instructions. Regardless the lack of performance compared with Intel, Cyrix had a very good market in the mid 90s, for people that did not have the money to purchase Intel. Instead of purchasing an Intel at 166 Mhz with 400 dollars, one could purchase a Cyrix at 150 Mhz for only 99 dollars. Of course, the performance of the cyrix would be far smaller, but the price difference would make it worthwile. Had a Cyrix between 97 and 2000. Was very happy with it.
No. Apple only writes programming language in Mac OS X for Intel and PowerPC processors.
This notebook is great for gaming! The Panasonic Toughbook is definitely suitable. Intel Processors are much more suited to the heavy workload that serious gaming dictates, more so than Athlon processors.
In '05, Apple CEO announced that Apple would be transitioning from its long favored PowerPC architecture to the Intel architecture, because the future PowerPC road map was unable to satisfy Apple's needs. Apple had its entire line of consumer Macs running on Intel processors by early August 2006. The Apple Xserve server was updated to Intel Xeon processors from November 2006, and is offered in a configuration similar to Apple's Mac Pro. They're partners with both.