I thinks its Nuclear fission that’s what I put
By nuclear power plants
No. It is a nuclear reaction - radioactive disintegration.
The radioactive materials produced in a nuclear reactor are radioactive because of instability in the nucleus of the atoms of the radioactive materials. Chemistry only affects the way elements behave because of the electron structure. Chemistry is electonic and the radioactive products have problems in their nuclei. Chemistry doesn't affect the nucleus of the atom, so chemical methods cannot be used to deal with radioactive materials, per se.
Polonium is a radioactive chemical element.
Yes, nuclear fusion produces some radioactive waste, but it is generally less than what is produced by nuclear fission.
Nuclear Power
Nuclear fusion and nuclear fission are processes that involve nuclear reactions but are not examples of radioactive decay. Chemical reactions, such as burning wood, do not involve nuclear processes and are also not examples of radioactive decay.
The object of nuclear chemistry is the study of radioactive materials, nuclear wastes, chemical reactions in a nuclear reactor etc.
Zirconium does have radioactive isotopes, but the main ones used in industry are not radioactive.
Nuclear energy is not produced by chemical reactions
Technetium is considered to be an active element because it typically forms compounds and undergoes chemical reactions. It is a silvery-gray metal that is radioactive and does not occur naturally in the Earth's crust, making it an artificially produced element in nuclear reactors.
Yes, radioactive isotopes are produced in a nuclear reactor through the process of nuclear fission, where heavy atomic nuclei are split into smaller fragments. These fragments, some of which are unstable and radioactive, can be used for various purposes such as medical imaging, cancer treatment, and scientific research.