not sure if this is correct - but the Headingly test 81 team of Boycott Gooch Brearly Gatting Gower Botham Willey Taylor Dilley Willis Old had 7
The word are is the plural present tense of the verb to be. This is among the most irregular of the English language's irregular verbs. I am, he is, they are, we are, in the present; in the past it becomes I was, he was, they were, we were. In the future, I am going to be.
In Bulgarian there are just 9 tenses: -Present -Past tense of perfective verbs - Aorist(um) -Past tense of imperfective verbs - Imperfektum -Past perfect -Present perfect -Future -Future perfect -Future in past -Future in past perfect but english has got 12 tenses (indicative) and spanish 20 in indicative mood and 12 in subjunctive mood
In Bulgarian there are just 9 tenses: -Present -Past tense of perfective verbs - Aorist(um) -Past tense of imperfective verbs - Imperfektum -Past perfect -Present perfect -Future -Future perfect -Future in past -Future in past perfect but english has got 12 tenses (indicative) and spanish 20 in indicative mood and 12 in subjunctive mood
It will be future English because in the middle ages they spoke Middle English i know this because of history lessons and we speak new English now!
One of the most confusing verbs for non-English speakers is the verb "to be." It is an irregular verb, and "am" is the first person singular, present tense. The present of "to be" goes like this: I am, you are, he/she/it is; we are, you (plural) are, they are. In the past tense, the forms are: I was, you were, he/she/it was; we were, you (plural) were, they were. And the future is "will be"-- it does not change at all: I will be, you will be, he/she/it will be, etc.
One of the most confusing verbs for non-English speakers is the verb "to be." It is an irregular verb, and "am" is the first person singular, present tense. The present of "to be" goes like this: I am, you are, he/she/it is; we are, you (plural) are, they are. In the past tense, the forms are: I was, you were, he/she/it was; we were, you (plural) were, they were. And the future is "will be"-- it does not change at all: I will be, you will be, he/she/it will be, etc.
One of the most confusing verbs for non-English speakers is the verb "to be." It is an irregular verb, and "am" is the first person singular, present tense. The present of "to be" goes like this: I am, you are, he/she/it is; we are, you (plural) are, they are. In the past tense, the forms are: I was, you were, he/she/it was; we were, you (plural) were, they were. And the future is "will be"-- it does not change at all: I will be, you will be, he/she/it will be, etc.
No but most of them present some movies in English.
The present tense in the English language serves to convey information about what is happening NOW, as opposed to before or later (past and future tense). "I have a wonderful receipt for pound cake." "I think Obama is a wonderful president." It is designed for discussions. It is used in reading books. It expresses likes and dislikes. It is used to give directions. Most conversation and entertainment is done in the present tense.
I'm pretty sure most of them do, because before they were turned into Vizards by Aizen they were Captains and Vice-Captains
For most marriage is a statement of devotional love of the past present and future. Yes i think marriage is needed.To show others that there is Morales that still exist.
Today most of country have follow English language, and we should have knowledge about English if we want to become a successful person in life and in future.