James W. Marshall
Not if the employee was not given the opportunity to choose his or he own medical provider. If the employer required the employee to visit a specific care provider then the employee should be covered by his or her medical insurer or the company's.
If the employee built the item under the direction of the employer, using the employer's plans or specifications, the employer will be responsible. If the employee did not follow the directions of the employer, particularly if it strayed from the standards of a normal build, then the employee could be held responsible.
A competent employee is an employee knowing their job and performing it well, someone who is also reliable and responsible.
Anyone can be sued. The judge will decide if the suit has merit.
the employee is responsible
No, the company is not responsible when a person is assaulted on the job. The person who assaulted them is responsible.
Only if you have proof beyond the shadow of a doubt that they lied and the broker was an employee and not a subcontractor.
An employee whose drawing wage or basic salary has upto rs 6500/- responsible to pay pf contribution 12 % from employer & employee respectively.
not unless the employee was on company time or buisiness if the employee was on their own time the corporation is not resposable
Not in this case, as both the wife and the employee are held responsible.
only the employee or the supervisor of the employee responsible for installing the AF Form 979
Shop floor employee is often the one who is responsible for stacking shelves or putting items out / rearranging them.