0
Which act subsidized farmers who took land out of production in order to raise crop prices?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Economic reforms have an adverse effect on food security?
Banning of food exports in order to lower local food prices damages the livelihood of local farmers and discourages them from producing food. Which can lead to decreased food production and decreased food security. Providing subsidies to local farmers in order to disadvantage foreign farmers can decrease food security in poor countries who can't afford to subsidize their farmers to the same extent. Putting up tariffs and taxes on imports and exports of food in order to manipulate food prices in favor of consumers often puts farmers at a disadvantage and discourages them from producing food. Which decreases food security. It's not so much economic reforms that decrease food security as it is manipulation and interference in food markets in order to damage the livelihood of some farmers for short-term benefit of consumers or for long-term benefit of some other farmers. Banning of food exports in order to lower local food prices damages the livelihood of local farmers and discourages them from producing food. Which can lead to decreased food production and decreased food security. Providing subsidies to local farmers in order to disadvantage foreign farmers can decrease food security in poor countries who can't afford to subsidize their farmers to the same extent. Putting up tariffs and taxes on imports and exports of food in order to manipulate food prices in favor of consumers often puts farmers at a disadvantage and discourages them from producing food. Which decreases food security. It's not so much economic reforms that decrease food security as it is manipulation and interference in food markets in order to damage the livelihood of some farmers for short-term benefit of consumers or for long-term benefit of some other farmers.
What goal does the government pursue in a socialist economic system?
Socialism has no government and no economy: production for use, no wages or prices, just people co-operating for the common good.
Agricultural subsidies-a boon or a bane?
The use of agricultural subsidies is widespread in the Caribbean. The objectives are: to encourage adoption of improved agricultural practices for increasing agricultural production and conservation of natural resources. The subsidies are provided in the form of cash, production inputs and, more recently, as rebates on income taxes. There are many rather small cash and other incentives. Farmers do not perceive these as incentives to practice adoption but rather as snippets of assistance or dole provided by governments to farmers. This perception, plus the disproportionate amount of energy and time small farmers must exert in order to obtain these small subsidies can create in them feelings of irritation and frustration. As a result they tend to perceive these small subsidies as needed nuisances, more bane than boon. Caribbean farmers are market oriented and respond to meaningful monetary incentives. Given a choice they would prefer to have an assured market and a "reasonable" price for their farm produce or the availability at reduced prices of production of marketable produce.
What question must be asked in order for economic production to take place?
How is production to be organized
Differences demand-pull inflation and cost-push inflation?
Demand-pull inflation: prices rise due to shortage; firms produce more and raise price to meet demand. Cost-push inflation: prices rise due to increasing costs of production; firms raise price in order to not produce less.
Which industry is the most heavily subsidized in the country?
In the United States, the industry most heavily subsidized is farming. In order to address the needs of the people, the government must pay farmers to produce food, because it not lucrative.
B Economic reforms have an adverse effect on food security Comment?
Banning of food exports in order to lower local food prices damages the livelihood of local farmers and discourages them from producing food. Which can lead to decreased food production and decreased food security. Providing subsidies to local farmers in order to disadvantage foreign farmers can decrease food security in poor countries who can't afford to subsidize their farmers to the same extent. Putting up tariffs and taxes on imports and exports of food in order to manipulate food prices in favor of consumers often puts farmers at a disadvantage and discourages them from producing food. Which decreases food security. It's not so much economic reforms that decrease food security as it is manipulation and interference in food markets in order to damage the livelihood of some farmers for short-term benefit of consumers or for long-term benefit of some other farmers. Banning of food exports in order to lower local food prices damages the livelihood of local farmers and discourages them from producing food. Which can lead to decreased food production and decreased food security. Providing subsidies to local farmers in order to disadvantage foreign farmers can decrease food security in poor countries who can't afford to subsidize their farmers to the same extent. Putting up tariffs and taxes on imports and exports of food in order to manipulate food prices in favor of consumers often puts farmers at a disadvantage and discourages them from producing food. Which decreases food security. It's not so much economic reforms that decrease food security as it is manipulation and interference in food markets in order to damage the livelihood of some farmers for short-term benefit of consumers or for long-term benefit of some other farmers.
Economic reforms have an adverse effect on food security?
Banning of food exports in order to lower local food prices damages the livelihood of local farmers and discourages them from producing food. Which can lead to decreased food production and decreased food security. Providing subsidies to local farmers in order to disadvantage foreign farmers can decrease food security in poor countries who can't afford to subsidize their farmers to the same extent. Putting up tariffs and taxes on imports and exports of food in order to manipulate food prices in favor of consumers often puts farmers at a disadvantage and discourages them from producing food. Which decreases food security. It's not so much economic reforms that decrease food security as it is manipulation and interference in food markets in order to damage the livelihood of some farmers for short-term benefit of consumers or for long-term benefit of some other farmers. Banning of food exports in order to lower local food prices damages the livelihood of local farmers and discourages them from producing food. Which can lead to decreased food production and decreased food security. Providing subsidies to local farmers in order to disadvantage foreign farmers can decrease food security in poor countries who can't afford to subsidize their farmers to the same extent. Putting up tariffs and taxes on imports and exports of food in order to manipulate food prices in favor of consumers often puts farmers at a disadvantage and discourages them from producing food. Which decreases food security. It's not so much economic reforms that decrease food security as it is manipulation and interference in food markets in order to damage the livelihood of some farmers for short-term benefit of consumers or for long-term benefit of some other farmers.
How do I find subsidized housing?
In this economy being qualified for subsidized housing is very difficult. Since many people are attempting to sign up for it. It can take upwards of two years in order qualify for these systems.
What goal does the government pursue in a socialist economic system?
Socialism has no government and no economy: production for use, no wages or prices, just people co-operating for the common good.
How breeding help us to produce cow which give more milk?
Biotechnology, farmers now have the ability to selective breed cows in order to strengthen milk production and longevity.
What was the Production Budget for The Order?
The Production Budget for The Order was $35,000,000.
Agricultural subsidies-a boon or a bane?
The use of agricultural subsidies is widespread in the Caribbean. The objectives are: to encourage adoption of improved agricultural practices for increasing agricultural production and conservation of natural resources. The subsidies are provided in the form of cash, production inputs and, more recently, as rebates on income taxes. There are many rather small cash and other incentives. Farmers do not perceive these as incentives to practice adoption but rather as snippets of assistance or dole provided by governments to farmers. This perception, plus the disproportionate amount of energy and time small farmers must exert in order to obtain these small subsidies can create in them feelings of irritation and frustration. As a result they tend to perceive these small subsidies as needed nuisances, more bane than boon. Caribbean farmers are market oriented and respond to meaningful monetary incentives. Given a choice they would prefer to have an assured market and a "reasonable" price for their farm produce or the availability at reduced prices of production of marketable produce.
Does Federal milk marketing order regulates retail milk prices of fluid milk?
Technicaly, no, the milk marketing order regulates the price that dairy farmers receive. Obviously, the consumer price and the farm price are linked, so in the end the USDA regulates both prices. For more information try http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Dairy/Policy.htm
Were peasants and farmers with small farms at the bottam of the social order?
Peasants, yes. Farmers, it depends. If they were peasant farmers then again, yes, but if they were Gentry and/or Yoeman farmers then they were middle class.
What is OPEC an example of?
OPEC is an example of a cartel, where member countries come together to coordinate and control oil production levels in order to stabilize prices and ensure their collective interests are met.
What was the Production Budget for Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix?
The Production Budget for Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix was $150,000,000.
