Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy.
right answer: They had different ideas about the meaning of the social contract.
The differnce in ideas between Thomas Hobbes and john Locke can be best described as ideological because Hobbes thinks that mankind is 'self-interested' while Locke thinks that natural law presupposes that all humans are created equal and independent.
Thomas Hobbes believed in an absolute monarchy and that individuals are naturally self-serving and in constant conflict. He argued for a strong central government to maintain order. john Locke believed in a limited government that protects individual rights and that people are born with natural rights to life, liberty, and property. He advocated for a social contract between the government and the governed.
A major difference between Thomas Hobbes and John Locke is their views on the state of nature. Hobbes believed it to be a state of war and chaos, necessitating a strong central authority, whereas Locke saw it as a state of freedom and equality, advocating for limited government intervention to protect natural rights.
Hobbes believed that people were naturally evil, while Locke did not.
One key difference between Hobbes and Locke is their views on the role of the state to protect individual rights. Hobbes believed in a strong central authority to maintain order and society, while Locke emphasized the protection of natural rights and limited government intervention to preserve individual freedoms.
One key difference between Montesquieu and Hobbes is their views on government. Hobbes believed in an absolute monarchy and the need for a strong central authority to maintain order, while Montesquieu advocated for a system of checks and balances with separate branches of government to prevent tyranny.
One major difference between Thomas Hobbes and John Locke is in their beliefs about human nature. Hobbes believed that humans are inherently selfish and violent, emphasizing the need for a strong central authority to maintain order. In contrast, Locke believed that humans are inherently rational and cooperative, arguing for limited government to protect individual rights.
Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy
Montesquieu believed in the separation of political power, while Hobbes did not.
Hobbes believed that people were naturally evil, while Locke did not.
(Apex) Hobbes believed that people were naturally selfish and violent, while Locke did not.
Hobbes believed that people were inherently evil, while Locke argued people were born as blank slates.
Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy
It was how he farted a lot
They had different ideas about the meaning of the social contract.
They had different ideas about the meaning of the social contract.
They had different ideas about the meaning of the social contract.
Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy.right answer: They had different ideas about the meaning of the social contract.The differnce in ideas between Thomas Hobbes and john Locke can be best described as ideological because Hobbes thinks that mankind is 'self-interested' while Locke thinks that natural law presupposes that all humans are created equal and independent.
Hobbes was more in favor of monarchy