endoplasmic reticulum
Gamma radioactivity would be the most dangerous because, unlike alpha particles that can be blocked by paper or skin, and beta particles which can be shielded by foil, gamma radioactivity would need a lead shield. Plus gamma radioactivity effects organic material.
According to the work of the Curies, which action would increase the radioactivity of polonium? Dissolve the polonium in a solvent.Heat the polonium until it becomes a gas.Expose the polonium sample to light.Increase the amount of polonium.
Yes, you will find radioactivity as one of the end product of photosynthesis if the water containing radioactive oxygen is given to plants.
There are many forms of pyrite, and it is possible that a radioactive isotope may be incorporated, but this is very uncommon. Even then the radioactivity would not be at harmful levels.
A magnet would only be useful if some component(s) of the mixture were ferromagnetic (e.g. iron, nickel, cobalt, magnetite), in which case such component(s) would stick to the magnet and the remainder would be left behind.
increase
No, but there would be more release of radioactivity because the reactor itself would probably be melted in the explosion.
balance
Gamma radioactivity would be the most dangerous because, unlike alpha particles that can be blocked by paper or skin, and beta particles which can be shielded by foil, gamma radioactivity would need a lead shield. Plus gamma radioactivity effects organic material.
Many. The questions first word "which" implies that a single component would be a correct answer but there are thousands of components and dozens of component types on a computer motherboard.
That one The structure that would contain the most radioactivity would be chromosomes, because chromosomes are made up of DNA.
Not a battery alone - no.
a large component of meat in the diet tends to decrease pH, while a large component of plant-based material in the diet tends to increase pH
they felt it would increase trade with France .
The opposite would be non-radioactive. For elements, the opposite is stable.
Well, there's always a possibility of anything emitting radioactivity once it has been around a radioactive source without gear/protection. All the best.
Yes. And if massive enough then the density may increase due to gravitational attraction in a matter of time we can perceive. even with a small mass this is happening, however it may take 1000s to millions of years for it to be measurable.In most cases the mass would remain the same (absent radioactivity losses) but the density would increase. If highly radioactive its mass would likely decrease over time.