The world would be better off if political boundaries didn't exist.
A claim is defensible when it is supported by credible evidence, logical reasoning, and sound methodology. It should address counterarguments and demonstrate a clear connection between the evidence and the conclusion drawn. Additionally, a defensible claim is transparent, allowing others to evaluate the validity of the supporting arguments and evidence. Ultimately, rigor and clarity in presentation strengthen the defensibility of a claim.
It is both arguable and defensible.
Improving bicycle lanes would reduce road accidents
But it seems it is also the least defensible of circumstances.
No affirmative action is morally defensible.
Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. The statement "There should be no minimum voting age" is definitely arguable, like, come on, people can argue about anything these days. But is it defensible? Well, that's a whole other story. So, the answer is D) It is arguable but not defensible. Like, you can argue it all day long, but defending it might be a bit tricky.
The claim that the ancient Romans were not artistic is not easily defensible, if it is defensible at all. For, in respect to architecture, a number of visual arts (such as sculpture), and literature (poetry and prose alike), among other areas, the Romans were quite distinctively and admirably artistic by comparison with other ancient (and later) peoples and cultures.
A defensible thesis is a statement that can be supported with evidence and reasoning. It should be clear, specific, and arguable to encourage critical thinking and discussion. Adequate research and analysis are required to back up a defensible thesis.
no
There are 4.
An example of a claim that should be revised is, "All teenagers are irresponsible." This statement is overly broad and lacks nuance, as it fails to consider the diversity of individual behaviors and circumstances among teenagers. To make it more defensible, it could be revised to say, "Some teenagers may exhibit irresponsible behavior due to various factors, but many demonstrate responsibility in their daily lives." This revision acknowledges variability and allows for a more balanced discussion.
Giving children mobile phones can protect them in emergencies.