the human impact on the environment is long lasting but ultimately temporary.
Nature is more powerful than it first appears.
Humans and nature live in a precarious balance
the human impact on the environment.......
Nature is more powerful than it first appears.
or
Humans and nature live in a precarious balance
or
Humans and nature live in a precarious balance
Both are correct: "I agree with you" would be used most often, but "I do agree with you" could be used for emphasis.
The more sources there are to corroborate a conclusion, the more likely that conclusion is to be true. -Apex
You ask for THE figurative image and there would be many of them, however the origin of the expression is from the gold rush when people would stick a stake in the ground to claim a piece of land.
It means "Say what you're arguing" Your claim would be your argument, or what you're trying to persuade someone of. State means to say.
They agree on having a representative government that would also take into account.
In "The World Without Us," Alan Weisman explores the hypothetical scenario of how nature would reclaim and reshape the environment if humans suddenly disappeared. He argues that without human intervention, nature would gradually heal and rebuild itself, erasing many of the traces of human civilization over time.
Unless the rabbi was a Messianic Jew he would disagree. A Catholic priest would agree with the claim that Jesus was God.
It is christianity, but some would claim Islam, but I agree with the first.
there are many gods in the universe
Gestalt
speaker 2
Fedralists
loyalist
speaker 1
there are many gods in the universe
for instance
Transcendentalists would most likely agree with the importance of individualism, self-reliance, and the interconnectedness of nature and the divine. They believed in the inherent goodness of people and the possibility of personal transformation through intuition and spiritual insight.