of these two choices, the longbow is the definate answer.
A longbow was much lighter than a crossbow and provided a better rate of fire.
Oak longbows can fire up to Mithril By snerderwerder (nickname)
A longbow could shoot arrows up to 250 yards, depending on the skill of the archer and the type of arrow used.
The English's weapon selection included the longbow, which could shoot almost precisely had great distances. The French did not have this weapon.
An English longbow in medieval warfare could shoot arrows up to 250 yards, or about 229 meters.
Both offered fairly long range and were most effective in volley fire. However a longbow required many years of training and practice to produce a useful archer. Gunpowder muskets and pistols could be used with only minimal training.
The longbow could reach far out and also penetrate armour of those days and kill horses. Cavalry was feared by common soldiers and the longbow was their protection .
battering ram, scaling ladder, catapult, longbow, fire, and tunnels
what is the antonym for longbow
It depends solely upon your goals: For training, use a shortbow, as they fire more often. If you need distance, use a longbow, as they are able to go over a farther distance.
a longbow is a bow that is long
the longbow has a longer range, and a better rate of fire. the bow was easy to disassemble, so the bowstring could be taken off in the rain, to protect it. the crossbow was more powerful, but fired a heaver bolt, meaning there was less range. it was susceptible to failure in the rain, as the string could not be easily removed, and it took a lot more effort to prepare it for fire, by winching the bowstring onto its trigger after each shot. However, the crossbow also could be learnt far quicker and easier than the longbow, which took years of training and constant practice to be good with - which meant that while the crossbow itself was more complex to make, its use was cheaper for training soldiers.