answersLogoWhite

0

Prussia, Austria, and Russia, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, and several of the smaller German and Italian states.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How did enlightened despots both advance and undermine enlightenment ideals?

Enlightened despotism is a form of absolute monarchy or despotism in which rulers were influenced by the Enlightenment. The primary enlightenment idea undermined is democracy. Such as Catherine the Great and Napolean.


What is the comparative and superlative of enlightened?

The comparative form of "enlightened" is "more enlightened," and the superlative form is "most enlightened."


Why did enlightened absolutism fail?

Enlightened absolutism was a form of absolute monarchy. It began to fail because of a struggle of ideals between the rulers and countries involved.


What countries have a despotism?

A despotism is a form of government in which a single entity rules. The difference between a despotism and a monarchy is that the ruling party in a despotism usually rules by his/her own rules, while a monarch usually has to follow established laws. Some examples of despotisms include North Korea, China, Cuba, and Venezuela.


What is an enlightened despots?

Answer 1Also called benevolent despotism, enlightened despotism is a form of government most common in the 18th century in which absolute monarchs pursued legal, social, and educational reforms inspired by the Enlightenment.Answer 2An enlightened despot was a monarch during the 18th century who brought about political, religious, and social reforms that were considered of an enlightened nature. Their reforms benefited both the people and the monarchy.In the end, enlightened despotism can be seen as the final stage of absolute monarchy, but also started a new conception of government power as rule by and under public law. This involved abandoning the idea of rule by "divine right,". When Frederick II referred to himself as merely "the first servant of the state," he understood and foresaw a new concept of government. A government that justified new powers for governments in the name and service of public welfare. It also means thinking in secular terms.


What do despotism and theocracy have in common?

In the definition, few things. Despotism is a form of government in which the powers is centralized in the hand of one man. Despotism is different from dictature in the sense that, in a dictature, an individual is entrusted all political powers. Theocracy is a form of government in which the religious power controls the civil life. You can say some theocracies are a form of "religious despotism".


What countries uses despotism?

Well, friend, despotism is a form of government where a single ruler holds all the power. It's not about specific countries using it, but rather it's a type of governing style that can be found in various places throughout history. Remember, there's always room for growth and change towards more inclusive and compassionate forms of leadership.


What does absolute despotism mean in the declaration?

Absolute Despotism is a form of government that allows no definition of reality other than that promulgated by the government. Under Absolute Despotism, the point of view of the individual is to be destroyed, when that point of view disagrees with the view generated by Absolute Despotism. http://www.christiangallery.com/chap13.htm


What is the absrtact noun for tyrant?

The abstract noun form of the concrete noun 'despot' is despotism.


What is the government called when the ruler can make any laws he wants to?

Autocracy (a form of despotism)


How did Rousseau differ from the voltaire?

Rousseau emphasized the importance of emotions and intuition in human nature, while Voltaire focused on reason and critical thinking. Rousseau also advocated for a more direct form of democracy and criticized social hierarchies, while Voltaire supported a more enlightened despotism and was less critical of existing social structures.


What part of speech is despotism?

"Despotism" is a noun. It refers to a form of government in which a single entity or leader holds absolute power, often exercising it in a tyrannical manner. The term describes both the system of governance and the oppressive nature associated with it.