The Russians lead in this dismal category by a very wide margin, in both world wars. In the first war the soldiers were brave but most of their commanders were fools, many appointed because of royal blood, which proved no guarantee of military ability. In the second war the soldiers were brave but the national leader was a paranoid maniac, and their generals were ruthless and unconcerned with troops losses, until the very end when they began to run a little bit short of cannon fodder. Up to that point they would march men straight through minefields, reasoning that they would have lost the same number of men had the enemy defended with machine guns. Very logical, completely inhuman. The only thing worse than being a German soldier on the eastern front was being a Russian soldier.
Chile and Saudi Arabia suffered the most.
In World War 2, Germany suffered more casualties than either Italy or Japan. Only Russia and China suffered more casualties than Germany.
who had th most battle casualties during the second world war, us.infantry
france.because much of northern France had been a battlefield.
battle of paesschendaele
Chile and Saudi Arabia suffered the most.
In World War 2, Germany suffered more casualties than either Italy or Japan. Only Russia and China suffered more casualties than Germany.
Germany lead the way in casualties, with some 19 Million dead.
World war Two, Russian had over 10million casualties.
who had th most battle casualties during the second world war, us.infantry
Russia
Sweden was neutral during the war, but agreed to most demands from Nazi Germany, such as troop transport through the country.
The USSR (Russia).
more allies died in ww1. i am not exactly sure why. there is a breakdown of casualties on wikipedia.
Well, the campaign with the most casualties was Operation Barbarossa, which was the German invasion of Russia. The battle with the most casualties was the Battle of Moscow
Mexico by a wide margin.
france.because much of northern France had been a battlefield.