0
Two answers are possible depending on the context in which an answer is being sought.
Firstly, the Roman Catholic church in the 1870's defined at a Council of the church, the doctrine of Papal Infallibility. This states briefly that when the Pope speaks ex cathedrathat is 'officially' in his teaching role as head of the Roman Catholic church that he is infallible and without error.
Secondly, Christians who are Bible believers hold to the doctrine of Bible Infallibility. Usually this relates to The Bible as originally written, in Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic, as there are possibilities of minor copyists errors as well as translational difficulties etc. Essentially the Bible is without error because it is seen as being divinely inspired and God Himself is of course perfect.
What else can I help you with?
Harmless error doctrine?
If there is an error in doctrine then it could change the whole meaning of that doctrine and become misleading. While some error may be so insignificant that it does not alter the meaning of the doctrine. One error may be "Christ was able to perform miracles" but is quoted "Christ is able to perform miracles" The was and is does not change the meaning.
What is the gift that protects the pope from error when speaking on faith and morals?
It is not so much as a gift as a doctrine - the Doctrine of Infallibility.
What doctrine provides that not all errors in erroneously admitting evidence requires reversal of conviction?
The doctrine of "harmless error" provides that not all errors in the admission of evidence necessitate a reversal of conviction. Under this doctrine, a conviction may be upheld if the appellate court determines that the error did not affect the outcome of the trial or that the evidence was overwhelmingly sufficient to support the conviction, regardless of the erroneous admission. Essentially, if the court finds that the error was unlikely to have influenced the jury's decision, it may deem the error harmless.
What is the harmless error doctrine?
The harmless error doctrine is a legal principle used in appellate courts to determine whether a trial court's error affected the outcome of a case. If an error is deemed "harmless," it means that despite the mistake, the overall result would likely have been the same without it, and thus, the appellate court may uphold the original decision. This doctrine aims to prevent the reversal of convictions or judgments based on trivial or inconsequential errors that do not impact the fairness of the trial.
STATEMENT-ALL APPARTMENTS ARE HOUSESNO APARTMENT IS MOTEL.CONCLUSION:SOME HOUSES BEING HOTEL IS A POSSIBILITY.NO HOUSE IS A HOTEL?
IN THIS CASE POSSIBILTY IS TAKEN AND IN POSSIBILTY EVERYTHING IS POSSIBLE
Will there be Pokemon DSiWare?
There is a possibilty that there will be Pokemon Red on DSIWare
Will sunstreaker be transformers 3?
there is a possibilty that he may come
What is an example sentence for denies?
John Doe denies stealing the money.
The construction denies the states the power to?
The construction denies the states the power to:
What is papal infalliability?
The Doctrine of Papal Infallibility means the pope cannot error when issuing decrees or declarations on matters of faith and morals.
The harmless error doctrine applies to cases involving the admissibility of?
The legal doctrine of harmless error is found in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, extensive case law and state statutes. It comes into use when a litigant appeals the decision of a judge or jury, arguing that an errorof law was made at trial that resulted in an incorrect decision or verdict. The appelate court then must decide whether the error was serious enough to strike down the decision made at trial. Review for harmless error involves a complicated test that applies to state and federal laws as well as rules of procedure. If an error is held to be serious, the appellate court is likely to set aside the decision of the trial court and may order a new trial. If it deems the error harmless, the appellate court affirms the lower court's decision. The doctrine of harmless error thus prevents an unnecessary new trial when the error alleged would not have affected the outcome of the original trial. See: http://www.answers.com/topic/harmless-error
How big can an African elephants ear get?
possibilty 35inches long
