This argument appeals to the wheelchair ethos of the wealthy, upper-middle-class American slob.
An example of an ad hominem fallacy in "The Damnation of a Canyon" could be when the author attacks the character of conservationists instead of addressing their arguments directly. It would involve criticizing the personal traits or motives of the conservationists rather than engaging with the merits of their position on dam building.
Ad hominem
Ad hominem
Ad hominem
An ad hominem is a type of fallacy where an argument is directed against a person's character rather than the content of their argument. It involves attacking the individual making the argument rather than addressing the points they are trying to make.
An ad hominem fallacy, sometimes called a "genetic fallacy" or "to the person fallacy" or shorted to "ad hominem", is a kind of logical fallacy. This logical fallacy's definition is: attacking the person rather than the statements the person made.
Without knowing the specific statement, it is difficult to identify the type of logical fallacy. Can you please provide the statement so I can assist you further?
What is a ad hominem genetic fallacy?
An example of an ad hominem logical fallacy would be when someone attacks the character or traits of a person making an argument rather than addressing the actual argument itself. For instance, if participants in a debate call each other names or criticize personal attributes instead of focusing on the topic at hand, they are committing an ad hominem fallacy.
Ad hominem
Ad hominem
I'm happy to help identify a logical fallacy if you provide the passage for me to review.
This type of fallacy is called an ad hominem fallacy or ad hominem attack. The Latin term means "to the man" i.e. attacking the speaker rather than refuting the argument. It may also be referred to as an irrelevance.