(Apex) "Having thus seen Glen Canyon both before and after... its damnation, I feel that I am in a position to evaluate the transformation of the region caused by construction of the dam."
Anyone who has tried to pilot a motorboat through a raft of half-sunken logs, and bloated dead cows will have his own thoughts on the accessibility of these waters.
THIS IS THE ANSWER FOR APEX.
In the summer and fall of 1967 I worked as a seasonal park ranger at the new Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. During my five-month tour of duty I worked at the main marina and headquarters area . . . . APEX
One clear example of ethos from "The Damnation of a Canyon" could be when the author, Edward Abbey, shares his personal experience and expertise working as a park ranger in the Grand Canyon. This lends credibility to his arguments about preserving the natural beauty of the canyon.
In the summer and fall of 1967 I worked as a seasonal park ranger at the new Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. During my five-month tour of duty I worked at the main marina and headquarters area.
Having Thus Seen Glen Canyon both before and after . . . its damnation, I feel that I am in position to evaluate the transformation of the region caused by the construction of the dam.
I have had the unique opportunity to observe first had some of the difference between the environment of a free river and a power plant reservoir
An example of the author's use of ethos in "The Damnation of a Canyon" is when he appeals to his personal experience and credibility as a river guide and environmentalist to establish his authority on the topic of dam construction and its impact on the environment.
One example of ethos in "The Damnation of a Canyon" could be when the author, Edward Abbey, calls upon his experience as a park ranger in the Glen Canyon area to establish his credibility on the environmental impact of dam construction. This appeals to the reader's trust in his expertise and personal connection to the subject matter.
An example of logos in "The Damnation of a Canyon" would be a statement supported by logical reasoning and factual evidence, emphasizing the negative environmental impacts of dam construction on natural ecosystems, wildlife habitats, and water flow dynamics in the Grand Canyon.
An example of ethos from "The Damnation of a Canyon" could be when Edward Abbey uses his own experiences and expertise as a park ranger to establish credibility in his arguments against the construction of the Glen Canyon Dam. This approach appeals to the reader's sense of trust in Abbey's knowledge and personal investment in the preservation of natural landscapes.
In "The Damnation of a Canyon," the author uses ethos by drawing on his experience as a naturalist and advocate for preserving wilderness areas to establish credibility and expertise on the subject of damming the Glen Canyon. By sharing his personal connection to the landscape and his knowledge of its ecological importance, he creates trust with the reader and enhances the persuasive power of his argument against the dam project.
Ad hominem
Ad hominem
An example of an ad hominem fallacy in "The Damnation of a Canyon" could be when the author attacks the character of conservationists instead of addressing their arguments directly. It would involve criticizing the personal traits or motives of the conservationists rather than engaging with the merits of their position on dam building.
The Glen Canyon Dam and the creation of lake Powell destroyed the area's natural habitat.
Ad hominem
The author gives the reader facts about the area's animal and plant life both before and after the dam was built.
too much human industrialization can ruin natural habitats
Hostile and humorous (Apex)
hostile but also humorous
"The damnation of a canyon" is not a widely recognized logical fallacy. It may refer to the anthropomorphism of a canyon or the inaccurate attribution of human traits like evil or sin to a natural landform, which would be a fallacy of false analogy or anthropomorphism.
too much human industrialization can ruin natural habitats
People who disagree with his ideas about nature