answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which experimental procedure should the scientist use to determine the vaccines effectiveness?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

If a scientist has used a poorly designed experimental procedure to draw misleading generalizations what would identify the research as inaccurate?

The peer review process.......(studyisland)


Can a hypothesis that has no experimental data help a scientist?

`no!


What is a experimental investigation in science?

A scientist is trying to figure something out. The scientist makes a guess and figures out a way to test that guess. That is called an experimental investigation.


What is the variable that the scientist changes in an experiment?

experimental variable


How do you use the word scientist in a sentence?

The scientist was smart.!


What is the manner in which scientists intend to conduct an experiment?

The manner in which a scientist intends to conduct an experiment is called a plan or procedure.


What is it called when a scientist personal opinion affects the way experimental results are reported?

If the personal opinion of a scientist affects the way that the experimental results are reported, that is called bias.


Why do scientist use control groups in experiments?

Because it helps them know the results of the objects in the experiment and how they differ. This way the scientist knows which succeeded and which failed.


Who uses mathematics to propose untested ideas?

experimental scientist


What scientist did not have experimental evidence to support his theory of the atom?

Democritus


Who was one of the first scientist scientist to use numbers to look for patterns in experimental data?

gregor mendel


Why is probability important to a scientist?

Some but not all scientific models are based on the ability to determine the likelihood that a given experimental outcome has happened by chance alone. If you have an accurate understanding of how the variables in the experiment change when nothing in particular is affecting them, then you have a way to establish some confidence that your outcome is the result of your experimental procedure and not the result of purely random events. The experimental 'lingo' is that the researcher has to determine if the 'Null Hypothesis' can be rejected. The Null Hypothesis is that the experimental outcome is not significantly different from what you would expect if the experiment had no effect at all.As an example, if the probability in the natural world is that some event will happen by chance only one tenth of one percent of the time, then when I observe that event as my experimental outcome, I can be reasonably sure that my procedure has brought about the event; it is so unlikely that it happened by chance. It is not perfect, but few scientific procedures are. This also highlights the importance of replicating studies or of doing meta-analyses of experimental data gathered in many experiments to further reduce the likelihood that observed outcomes are nothing more than chance events.