Want this question answered?
This isn't the full answer sorry but The globetrotters plant
This isn't the full answer sorry but The globetrotters plant
No. Landmasses cover less than 1/3 of Earth.
well cant say how uniformitarianism would support it but as far as index fossils go think about the fact that a for a single species to survive on multiple continents at same time it would need the same environment and apparently its not the case now but Pangaea was a single continent @ one place with single environment. so if any index fossils spread across multiple continents point towards them being of same environment and the most logical explanation is them being at the similar lat-long which sort of points us towards the idea that is Pangaea!
Africa
Africa
Africa
Mainly that in the time of Pangaea, all of the land masses (or most of them) were joined into a single super-continent.
The most marine fossils are found in sedimentary rock
The province that has the most dinosaur fossils is ALBERTA
fish fossils and little animal fossils and also shells
It is accepted by most scientists that there was a supercontinent called Pangaea.