South Dakota is larger by 6,354 square miles.South Dakota, both in population and area.
South Dakota is bigger: 199731 km2 (North Dakota: 183112 km2)
South Dakota, with 814,180 recorded residents in the 2010 Census, has a larger population than North Dakota, with 672,591 residents.
No, North Dakota is smaller in both area and population.
It depends on what is determined to be a "large population". South Dakota has a larger population than North Dakota. The 2014 estimated population for South Dakota is 853,175. The 2014 estimated population for North Dakota is 739,842.Both states have large metropolitan areas. The Sioux Empire metropolitan area of South Dakota includes South Dakota's largest city, Sioux Falls, and had an estimated population of 228,261 in the 2010 census. The Fargo-Moorhead metropolitan area includes Fargo, North Dakota and Moorhead, Minnesota, and had an estimated population of 208,777 in the 2010 census.
yes, the north had a bigger population and the south had small population
0.26% of the total US population lives in South Dakota.
It is an analogy. North Carolina is to South Carolina as North Dakota is to South Dakota.
North Dakota is north of South Dakota.
The US state of North Dakota is north of South Dakota.
the north
North Dakota is up by the border of Canada, Wyoming is just next to South Dakota.