i would say that that is up to you....if you would want to pursue one of those things..you should do some research on it and see which interest you more as well as which one would provide you with the money you need to sustain the life you plan on living....but once again it is totaolly up to you. :)
It is because the index fossils has better minds than the paleontologist.
paleontologist use no concepts
paleontologist
a peron
Paleontologist
He was a canon in a church and an astronomer.
It is because the index fossils has better minds than the paleontologist.
he was an astronomer, philosopher, physicist, and mathematician in the 16-17th century in italy
Astronomer, physics, doctor, and lab tech.
it is completely up to the person who is going to pursue one of those careers to answer that question. But in my opinion being an astronaut seems to be the most rewarding out of the three choices
Paleontologist
Good question, it probably depends on what kind of scientist you ask. a paleontologist might say it was how the dinosaurs died, an astronomer might say is there life out there, and so on. Depends on who you ask
Nicolaus Copernicus was an astronomer. He also studied many other things such as medicine.
They could work a a museum a a tour guide, name all kinds of bones and animals, and teach science or at colledge.
With the aid of a paleontologist.
It's better to ask an astronomer
If you are an astronomer and your subject of observation is not Earth's sun, then yes observing at night is better.