Which is better eurofighter typhoon or f-22?

Answer 1

The Ef-2000 (Eurofighter 2000) Is the most advanced aircraft out on the market. The EF-2000 relies on BVRW beyond visual range warfare. The EF-2000 uses the simple delta wing configuration which is pretty similar to the mirage and the dassualt raffle. The EF-2000 was made to fly at supercruise AKA able to fly at a sustained speed of or over mach 1 without using an afterburner which drains the fuel dramatically. The Ef-2000 can also be called the typhoon for it's ferosity in battle. The EF-2000 is made up of carbon fibre composites, titanium, aircraft grade aluminium and plastics. The EF-200 is made unstable deliberately to reduce the drag and increase the "agiability". The Ef-2000 carries an X-band pulse doppler radar called the ECR-90 and also carries radar jamming systems. The Engines (my equal favourite part) the EF-2000 is made up of two EJ200 eurojet engines. Each engine is capable to sustain supercruise. each of these engines produce over 60kg newtons and with the afterburner 90kg newtons. The engines of the EF-2000 are also equipped with single crystal turbine blades (which is essential for modern day warfare.) The weaponry (my equal favourite bit) the EF-200 has the BVRW the pilot can engage an aircraft from this system giving it the slight edge over the other aircraft. The EF-2000 carries ten short range missiles and ten medium range missiles. The EF-2000 uses thirteen points which it can carry weaponry, The Ef-2000 also carries a 27mm Gatling gun which all this weaponry can be used and managed by a single monitor which shows the weapon and the status of the ammo heat ect. The EF-2000 Carries a on-board missile warning system which shows the pilot if they have AA missiles after them so they can engage their flares. Another feature the Ef 2000 has is the radar jamming equipment which is handy for the aircraft but not making it into a AWAC. The F-22 is rather simple to explain because it is not a fully stealth jet that avoids radar detection but the F-22 is stealthly enough to make it difficult for the opposing pilot to detect the F-22. The F-22 also has a bomb bay that has all it's weaponry it it (except for it's M61A2 vulcan 20mm rotary canon it the right hand side wing root) and has a hydrolic arm that launches the missile out of the bomb bay in less than 1 second. The answer to this question is that both planes aren't better than each other because the F-22 is an excellent interceptor and the Eurofighter is a great mulit-role fighter.

*****

The F-22 is not an interceptor, it is an air superiority/dominance fighter.

The answer to your question highly depends on what you mean by "better".

*If you want to bomb the living daylights out of something in a somewhat hostile airspace while defending yourself from a few enemy jets, then a flight of Eurofighter-2000 "Typhoons" is definitely the way to go.

*If you want to remain undetected while quickly and effectively clearing an extremely hostile airspace filled enemy aircraft and SAM sites on the ground, then a flight F-22 "Raptors" is the way to go.

Although the Raptor is capable of carrying and dropping bombs too, it will of course not perform as well as the "Typhoon" because the Raptor is not a multirole fighter. With the F-22, the majority of its combat focus is set for air-to-air engagements and remaining undetected.

If you mean "better" as in putting an F-22 against an EF-2000 in BVR (Beyond Visual Range), then the Raptor will shred the Typhoon into pieces before the typhoon even knew that there was a Raptor in the area. The Raptor can achieve this because of mainly 2 things:

-Defense: It can remain undetected to the EF-2000 in BVR because the Raptor is optimized to remain "invisible" to x-band Radars in BVR, denying most opponents, detection and tracking capabilities. This means that the opponent is denied a firing-solution.

-Offense: Because of its high supercruising speed (Mach 1.8 without afterburners) and high cruising altitude (18 km), coupled with a very advanced AESA radar (AN/APG-77), the Raptor can provide its AIM-120C AMRAAMs with a very good flight-envelope. This means that the AMRAAMs coming out of the F-22's bomb bays will have a high launch velocity and a high launch altitude, giving the missiles much more speed and range and the target less time and speed to survive.

In WVR (Within Visual Range) things get a little more complicated because the F-22 loses its stealth-advantage dramatically and with both jets being extremely agile, I would say a lot will depend on who the better pilot is.

A better comparison IMO would be EF-2000 VS either the F-15E or F-15SE.

IT--