"have taken" is correct
It should be: 'Some athletes took drug tests to proove they were not on steroids'
The first is almost correct. It should be, "Some athletes have taken drug tests to prove they are not on steroids." That is, "have taken" is the correct form, but it should also be "drug tests" rather than "drugs tests". "Have taken" is the correct form because "have" is the plural form, and "athletes" is plural. The singular form is "has taken", so it would be correct to say "One athlete has taken drug tests to prove he is not on steroids." Always use the past participle "taken" and not the simple past tense "took" in forms that use a form of the auxiliary verb "have": have taken, had taken, has taken, would have taken, and so on.
Some athletes have taken drug tests to prove they are not on steroids.
What is your question ????In this sentence take is an irregular verb
"Taken" is an irregular verb, "Take, took, taken." If it were regular it would be "Take, taked, taked".
Taken is an irregular verb. Taken is the past participle of the verb 'take'. If the verb was regular, then the past tense of 'take' would be 'taked' whereas instead it's took and taken.
Real small
That is the correct spelling of the verb "prove" (establish as fact).
Yes, they are. So they can have a chance to prove themselves not guilty!
prove they have mental health problems wich restrict them from taken part in everday life prove they are on drugs or abusive or dont care
They have to prove origin to that country. For example, providing proof a grandparent was born there.
Prove you were not the person in possession or that you didn't know it was drugs, or that it wasn't actually drugs, or that there is no evidence to show that you were the person in possession of the alleged drugs. Simple.