answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

No a virus is generally much worse than a bacterial. Bacterial are single celled organisms that are very big compared to a virus. You can kill bacterial in many ways such as antibiotics which make the bacteria cell walls burst, or with heat, cold UV light, silver or radiation.

Bacteria reproduce by cell division so 1 becomes 2, 2 become 4 etc.

A virus is not really a life form, it is just DNA in a thin membrane. The virus can enter a cell in the body where it hijacks the natural mechanisms inside the cell and uses them to replicate the virus DNA, This goes on until the cell is full of virus and eventually bursts releasing them so they can infect other cells. So where bacteria can multiple quickly by division, A virus can multiple very quickly by using the host organism to replicate it. Many thousands of viruses can be made by a single cell.

Mankind has cures and treatments for thousands of bacteria but has only ever eradicated one virus. The smallpox virus.

We can treat people for viral infections which block the virus entering the cells or we can use drugs which slow down or stop the replication of a virus when it is inside a cell, but mainly it is down to the immune system to defeat a virus.

Inoculations against a virus expose the immune system to parts of a virus or a similar but harmless virus, so if we become infected by that particlular virus in the future. the immune system will recognise it straight away and start to fight it. But this does not mean we are always immune to that virus, The immune system can still loose the fight!

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

This depends on the particular bacterial species of viral species. This could be answered by stating that viruses are more harmful because all viruses are pathogenic to humans (at least the ones that actually can infect humans) and they are generally harder to combat; however, certain bacterial infections can be very, very harmful as well, such as meningitis or necrotizing facitiis (soft tissue flesh-eating disorder).

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which is more harmful bacteria or virus?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Are microbes harmful?

All Microbes are not harmful. All virus are harmful. Some bacteria are harmful


Microorganisms that are harmful?

fungus, bacteria (sometimes) and virus. :)


Are bacteria more harmful than virus?

No. Actually, it would be more accurate to say that you really can't compare the two; some bacteria and some viruses are harmless, some of each will make you sick, and some of each are deadly.


What is more harmful than fungi?

virus


What are harmful virus?

Any virus is harmful. Your question should be "Is (insert name of virus here) harmful?"


Which is more dangerous a virus or bacteria?

it depends on the case of disease some viruses can be a lot more deadly than the worst of the bacteria diseases


Bacteria greatly out number harmful bacteria?

Yes. Most bacteria is not harmful to us such as bacteria in a yogurt, but some bacteria is harmful.


Harmful effects of bacteria?

some harmful effects of bacteria include: can cause decease's, sickness, unusual behavior in victim, spoil food. But there are many more.


Do antibiotics fight bacteria?

Antibitics destroy bacteris by breaking don the cell wlls inside harmful bacteria. They are not effective against virus infections such as colds or Flu


Is a ear infection a virus or bacteria?

Both. It can be either, but is more commonly a bacteria infection.


How much percent of bacteria are harmful?

Only 1% of bacteria is harmful to humans


How is bacteria harmful to the environment?

Certain types of bacteria can be harmful to the environment. Others help with natural processes like decomposing and stuff like that. So, it depends what kind of bacteria you are talking about.