0
What else can I help you with?
Which narrator would be able to tell a reader about what other characters think and do?
An omniscient narrator
What narrator reports and dialogue without telling the reader what characters think or feel?
An objective narrator reports action and dialog without telling the reader what characters think or feel.
What narrator reports action and dialogue without telling the reader what characters think or feel?
An objective narrator reports action and dialog without telling the reader what characters think or feel.
Which narrator would be able to tell readers about what other characters think and do?
An omniscient narrator would be able to tell readers about what other characters think and do, providing insights into the minds and actions of multiple characters throughout the story. This narrator has a broad perspective and can share information that is not limited to the perspective of just one character.
Why is it important to pick a narrator carefully when planning to write a narrative The narrator tells the story but it is the reader who controls how events are imagined. The narrator's point of vi?
The narrator tells the story, but it is the reader who controls how events are imagined. The narrator's point of view determines the sequence of events. The narrator must know what all characters think at all times. The narrative will change depending on the narrator's tone and point of view.
Which is the narrator who describes the facts about what happens in a story but does not give thoughts or feelings?
The third-person objective narrator describes only the actions and events in a story without delving into the thoughts or feelings of characters. This narrator remains impartial and sticks to reporting what is observable.
What is it when the author tells the reader directly in the narrator's voice what a character is like?
Third person, I think, is what youare looking for.
A narrator knows what only one character in a story sees feels thinks or knows a narrator knows what all characters in a story see feel think or know?
omniscient; limited
In The Cask of Amontillado why does Poe use a narrator to give a first-hand account of the story?
The first person point of view puts the reader inside the mind of the narrator, who might or might not be insane. The reader sees all the action from this point of view and feels as if he or she is the avenging murderer that Montresor is yet is never sure if this murder is justified or not because the reader never finds out if there ever were any injuries or insult that needed to be avenged. A narrative by a third person who did not describe the injuries and insult could be seen as simply uncaring or even ignorant of them, but when Montresor does not describe them, it might be because there is no "them" to describe. That's when you, the reader begin to think you, I mean, Montresor, might be insane.
What is the difference between third-person omniscient and third-person limited points of view?
In the third person POV, the narrator is always removed from the story (not one of the characters). They refer to the characters using third person pronouns (he, she, they, etc.) A limited narrator does not know the thoughts or emotions of the characters. Think of them like an invisible person observing what happens and what the characters say. An omniscient (all knowing) narrator knows the thoughts and emotions of all the characters. Think of them as a spirit or something supernatural that can understand everything that happens in the story, including the emotions, thoughts, and motives of each character.
Which might help a writer hint at the truth of a story told by an unreliable narrator?
To provide the reader with a way to understnad the story better.
What is the difference between third person limited and third person omniscient?
A third-person limited narrator does not have to speak in the character's voice.
