answersLogoWhite

0

To provide the reader with a way to understnad the story better.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why might a writer hint at the truth of a story as opposed to what an unreliable narrator says?

To clarify events and help the reader understand the story betterTo help the reader make better sense of the story's main events


Why might a writer hint at the truth of a story opposed to what an unreliable narrator says?

Answer this ques . Have the narrator slip and reveal an unexpected fact.


Is the omniscient narrator required to tell the truth?

Yes, the omniscient narrator is expected to tell the truth in a story. This narrator is all-knowing and presents information objectively, providing insight into characters and events from a neutral perspective. Misleading information would compromise the narrator's reliability and the overall credibility of the story.


A narrator who isnt consistent is considered?

unreliable. An unreliable narrator is a character whose interpretation of events in a story differs from the author's or the reader's. This can create ambiguity and add layers of complexity to the narrative.


What kind of narrator, unreliable for various reasons, cannot be trusted to accurately tell the story?

An unreliable narrator is a type of narrator who cannot be trusted to accurately tell the story due to various reasons.


Is Chopin The Story of an Hour considered a unreliable narrator?

No, the narrator in "The Story of an Hour" by Kate Chopin is not considered unreliable. The narrator presents the story in a straightforward manner and provides insight into the thoughts and emotions of the protagonist, Mrs. Mallard.


A narrator that is affected by his or her own personal bias is?

An unreliable narrator would reflect their bias in their telling of the story.


The narrator is always part of the story being told?

False. In literature, the narrator can be a character in the story (first-person narrator) or an outside observer (third-person narrator).


How is a first person narrator limited in a story?

The narrator might be mistaken or biased about the elements of the story.


What kind of narrator causes the reader to suspect a lack of credibility or trustworthiness?

How honestly does the narrator represent the world Does the narrator have something to hide/cover up. Does he have reason to "pad the truth" Does the narrator actually understand what is going on Is the narrator biased Does the narrator contradict what he/she says


What is an example of when a postmodern writer or the story's narrator begins to directly address the reader?

When a postmodern writer or the story's narrator begins to directly address the reader it is an example of metafiction, where the narrator intentionally exposes himself or herself as the author of the story.


Which question be best to help readers understand a story with a first person narrator?

The writer should ask himself, "How much should the narrator know about the story?".