0
What else can I help you with?
Why might a writer hint at the truth of a story opposed to what an unreliable narrator says?
Answer this ques . Have the narrator slip and reveal an unexpected fact.
Why might a writer use a naive narrator?
To set up ironic situations in which the reader knows something the narrator does not.rominee kotaralovescody kotara
Which is a way to tell if a narrator is reliable?
Reliable narrator is the standard form of narration in most stories. A narrator is the voice who is telling a story. That voice can be reliable or unreliable, in that it can be considered to always be telling the story accurately or not. Unreliable narration is really a special, rare case where the narrators credibility has been compromised. To understand reliable narration it is easiest to consider unreliable narration. A narrator might be considered unreliable if their telling of the story is shown likely be inaccurate. The narrator may give conflicting accounts of events (e.g. "Hero"), be revealed to be lying (e.g. "The Usual Suspects"), or it may become apparent that the narrator though believing their account might be suffering from a mental disorder (e.g. "Memento"). In all these situations the narrative is taking place from the first person perspective. Note that in the above examples (I used films, but it applies to everything) the narrator is deceiving the audience i.e. if the audience takes what the narrator says at face value then they have an inaccurate account of what took place. This is different from the narrator being either mistaken, or themselves deceived by another character, in which case they are not being unreliable.
Which of these is the best reason why an author would use an unreliable narrator?
to make a story more interesting (apex)
How is a first person narrator limited in a story?
The narrator might be mistaken or biased about the elements of the story.
The narrator's description of the Pardoner could justly be described as judgmental and biased What might you conclude from this?
He goes in the latest style : his hair is as yellow as wax and he lacks a beard.He also has a wallet stuffed with pardons, but this is a description not an attribute.He lacks a beard. B. He has a wallet stuffed with pardons. . His head is barehe goes in the latest styleshis hair is yellow as waxapex) funA & c
Which might help a writer hint at the truth of a story told by an unreliable narrator?
To provide the reader with a way to understnad the story better.
Why might Frontinus' and Juvenal's evidence on aqueducts be unreliable?
The evidence might be unreliable because technology and other knowledge has advanced since that time, and their evidence might have been biased.
You might add an extra layer of meaning and depth to your story by conceiving of the narrator as a what?
You could consider the narrator as a unreliable character in the story, creating a sense of mystery and ambiguity for the readers. This approach allows for a deeper exploration of the themes and motives within the narrative, keeping the audience engaged and guessing about the true intentions of the narrator.
What is the limitization of a first person narrator?
The limitations of a first person narrator include limited perspective, bias or unreliable narration, and constraints in presenting events outside of the narrator's direct experience. Additionally, the narrator's personal opinions and emotions can influence the way the story is portrayed to the reader.
What are the dis advantages of using old computers?
slow, might be unreliable
Why does seeing the events in these lines from the narrators point of view limit your understanding of what actually happening support your answer with explicit textual evidence?
Seeing events from the narrator's point of view limits understanding because the narrator's perspective could be biased or unreliable. For example, the narrator's emotions, experiences, or beliefs might color their interpretation of events, leading to a skewed portrayal. This can be seen in the text when the narrator's personal opinions intrude on the description of events, clouding the reader's perception of the truth.
