There are several answers to this question, but the most commonly found answer is: Coal, petroleum, natural gas, zinc, tin, limestone,iron ore, salt, slate, clay, chalk, gypsum, lead, silica, and arable land. there are also all the water bottles they produce. :) hope thats helpful
If the U.S. had been poor in natural resources, how would industrialization have been affected
Yes if the US was poor in natural resources industrialization would be greatly affected. There would be slower growth, and less wealth. There also would not be as many industries.
No Beacause Most Natural Resources Are Natural And The Resources That Are Not Are Just Resources
The minerals are natural resources. As a good citizen of india, what should you do to conserve our natural resources.
Flow Natural Resources are resources that flow.
gasese
If the U.S. had been poor in Natural Resources, how would industrialization have been affected
If the U.S. had been poor in natural resources, how would industrialization have been affected
what were the four natural resources needed for British industrialization
just because it does
New Technology Then
Yes if the US was poor in natural resources industrialization would be greatly affected. There would be slower growth, and less wealth. There also would not be as many industries.
water power coal and iron ore
Ines A. Smyth has written: 'Industrialization and natural resources' -- subject(s): Human ecology, Natural resources, Quality of life
(Apex) Access to natural resources that provided the materials and power needed for industrialization.
Geography and Natural ResourcesLarge labor force and stable governmentScientific advancements and excess wealthAll of the above are correct.
Cheap labor, the Civil War, railroads, and natural resources helped to fuel industrialization in the South. The 1890's marked the start of the industrialization of not only the South but the entire United States.