Speaking generally, technology affected the outcome of World War I in a significant way. Technological advances made it possible for the eventual victors (the western allies) to negate any technological innovation of their opponents (the Central Powers). Further, with the introduction of the first land-based armored fighting vehicles, to which the Central Powers had no technological answer, it contributed to their loss of morale and eventual surrender.
The new technology which had a real impact on the duration of the war was the tank.
Yes
It didnt really affect the war that much. the attack was to small to affect it very much.
Japan would surrender thus ending World War 2
It affected the war by giving advantage to the North.
Victory for the Allies.
Yes
it didnt
lazaj jubbi frist they fight for the world
It didnt really affect the war that much. the attack was to small to affect it very much.
Japan would surrender thus ending World War 2
it ended the war. Japan surrendered without conditions.
North Carolina affected the outcome of WW2 by purchacing tons of federal stamps and by training troops.
Technology developed during the war was used for consumer products.
They were surprised, upset that they were doing that over something really stupid
New weaponry, troop-disabling gases, and powerful tanks.
No, sonar didn't affect the outcome of World War I. Sonar and electronics technology were not far enough advanced to make a difference in the era from 1910 to 1920. Certainly the war spurred the efforts to develop sonar, but it didn't come far enough fast enough to have any significant effect on WWI at all. A link is provided to the Wikipedia article on sonar, and the section on "History" is brief and easy to read. Why not surf on over and check it out? Our friends there supply knowledge for free.
It was the beginning of the Civil War.