Nearly all New Testament scholars now believe that Markwas written around 70 CE, followed by Matthew, then Luke and John. So, they are all in the correct order by the date written, except Mark which was first.
If the questioner is asking which of the four accounts is closest to the actual chronology of Jesus' life, we do not have enough information about Jesus' life to answer that.
chronological order
AnswerThe books of the New Testament are not entirely in chronological order. The gospels are placed first, although some of the epistles were written earlier. Mark's Gospel is now known to have been the first gospel written, but is placed second. Paul's epistles are placed in order by size, from longest to shortest (with one exception) rather than by date written. Hebrews follows the Pauline epistles, because it was once thought to have been written by Paul. The other non-Pauline epistles are also placed in order by size.The chronological order of events differs a little among the three synoptic gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke), but is very different in John's Gospel. Even though each gospel presents events as if in chronological order, this is clearly not the case.
The four gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, John with Acts can be considered historical books in the New Testament. The book of Acts is a historical account from Jesus' ascension to travels of Paul in his missionary journeys which is more chronological in its account than the gospels. The gospels include historical accounts but are not written purely as a history text.
When something is in "chronological order", it means it is in order of time. For example, a story might be told in chronological order - explaining the events in the order they happened. "Non-chronological", of course, means that some things are told in a different order.
In chronological order, they are: Abraham, Moses, David, Jesus, and Paul.
In chronological order, Donatello, Verrocchio, Michelangelo, Bernini.
It depends what you mean by displaced. If you mean why is the order of events different to the preceding Gospels, it is because John is not arranged in chronological order but thematically.
Chronological order.
AnswerWe only know the probable order of events from the gospels themselves, so it could be hard to state that one is more accurate in terms of chronology than another. However, many Christians accept that John's Gospel, which differs so much from the other gospels, is not in chronological order. Matthew and Luke are similar to each other and to Mark. Perhaps, since Mark's Gospel was the first of the gospels and was used as the major source for Matthew and Luke, Mark may be more accurate in terms of chronology.AnswerThe synoptic gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are all chronological in form. Luke contains the most comprehensive coverage of events so could be regarded as the most chronological in that sense.
chronological order.
In the New Testament, the four gospels.
They are in chronological order.
Please place the books on the shelf in chronological order.
Chronological order would be I, II, III, IV if you are referring to those numbers. If you mean events as listed in some book, then we have no way of knowing.
1,2,3,4, is already in chronological order
chronological order
The books were in chronological order.