it depends on what do you want to do.
C is a compiled language, which means that the source is compiled in an executable that run directly in the machine and Java is interpreted (it is compiled to a 'byte code' that the java vm reads and executes
this has several advantages and disadvantages
Java is cross-platform (works in many OS's)
you don't need to recompile the java app to get it to work in another platform
in C you have to recompile it in each platorm you want to run it
C is more efficient
because it's compiled.
Java is more a high-level language.
this means that there are lots of things that are made automatically for you (such as memory handling etc) that in C aren't.
this is an advantage and also a disadvantage, because in C you can control more accurately what your app does, increasing the efficiency, but it's hard.
Java is an object oriented language (has classes and all that)
I find it very useful to make big apps.
Java needs the interpreter to work
that means that if someone wants to run your app, he'll have to dl and install Java.
I prefer java, but each one has his pros and cons. it depends on what do you want to do:
Program algorithms, calculations etc: C is better
Other stuff: Java
Look at it this way: C++ is a superset of C. C++ contains everythign that C does, plus more.
No, a C is not better than a C+. It is the other way around - A C+ is better than a C.
No. -c is worse than c while +c is better than c.
No. -c is worse than c while +c is better than c.
No, a C is not better than a C+. It is the other way around - A C+ is better than a C.
No. It is not.
C++ is a programming language, but, in the same time, it's a valid expression. Example:A= C++is equivalent with:A= C, C= C+1It's a bit of a joke. In the programming language C, ++ is the increment operator, so C++ can be interpreted as "C, except one better."
it is man u they have won 19 titles man c won 1
C++ supports class. It is used Object-oriented Programming(OOPs) concept whose based on objects. We can use many classes in a program. Function overloading, Inheritance etc. concept present in it. Easy maintenance of program. That's why it seems better than c. Is C++ better than C as you imply by the question. Just a thought. There are quite a few OO programming languages out there but on C++ is more popular. That would seem to imply that all the other OO programming languages are not much good or that C++ if the flavor of the month. I will make no pronouncement on that. C++ programs require more typing than C (if you are a poor typist, an important factor). Anything that can be programmed in C++ can be programed in C (and will probably run faster) and anything that can be programmed in C can be programmed in C++. C++ is perhaps harder to maintain and debug than C but C++ is supposedly better for relay large projects where the number of code lines gets to an absurd number. I would say that one language is not better than the other but rather that, one language is going to be better suited for a given project and the suitable language may be something other than C or C++.
C++, but it's always worth learning both, if only to better understand the machine code you create with C++.
C. C. Parkhurst has written: 'Business communication for better human relations'
It is very obvious ... COFFEE is always better than COFFEE
It is very obvious ... COFFEE is always better than COFFEE