Want this question answered?
That evolutionary theory is accurate, at least in its fundamental theses: common descent and natural selection.
inconspicuous flowers
Flower
cells that divide slowly
The onset of reactive hypoglycemia can be avoided or at least delayed by following the same kind of diet used to control it.
I HAVE CITIES ,BUT NO HOUSES I HAVE WATER ,BUT NO FISH I HAVE MOUNTAIN , BUT NO TREES WHAT AM I
true
The one with an adjective ending in -st or -est or the modifier "most" or "least."
A Standard Army Safety and Occupational Health Inspection must be conducted at least monthly.
4,120 pounds4,100 pounds4,200.34 pounds4,500.765 pounds
35 inches 37.2 inches 32 inches 30.984 inches
13.9 pounds 15.01 pounds 15.10 pounds 16.2 pounds
the least accurate way to identify a mineral
1. 35 inches 2. 37.2 inches 3. 32 inches 4. 30.984
When your doing an addition/subtraction problem in chemistry the significant figures has to do with LEAST accurate decimal place. How do you know which one is the least ACCURATE? Think of it this way: the more numbers you have following a decimal, the MORE accurate it is. And likewise, the fewer numbers following the decimal, the least it is accurate. Look at 2.00 + 3.1 + 4.175 See how the least accurate decimal place is tenths in 3.1? Therefore your final anwer ends in 9.3. With multiplication and division, you count the total sig figs in each value and then round the final answer to that number of sig figs. Example: 8.965x18.2= 163.163 (without sig figs) The number with the least amount of sig figs is 18.2 (3 sig figs). So you would round 163.163 to simply 163. Does that make sense?
The observable color is the least dependable method of mineral identification.
the one that had smaller least count wil be more accurate