0
Which part of the historian's argument does not rely on any historical evidence?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
In his opinion, it is morally wrong for any political movement to use any violence to achieve its goals
Hannah Banana
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What part of the historian's argument references specific examples of historical evidence?
Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones.
What part of speech is the word historical?
Historical is an adjective.
What is the part of an argument that is flawed and makes the argument invalid an error in reasoning?
That would be a moot point
What part of speech is the word evidence?
Evidence is a noun.
When should historians be capitalized?
Only when it forms part of the proper noun. Example: Organization of American Historians
How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Historians determine the superiority of arguments based on evidence, logical reasoning, and adherence to historical context. Arguments that are supported by primary sources, are coherent and well-reasoned, and accurately reflect the historical context are typically considered superior. It is also important to consider counterarguments and alternative perspectives in evaluating the strength of an argument.
What part of the historian's argument references specific examples of historical evidence?
Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones.
Is gathering information a necessary part of the historical thinking process?
Yes, gathering information is a crucial part of the historical thinking process. It involves examining multiple sources, evaluating their reliability, and analyzing the evidence to construct an accurate narrative of past events. This process helps historians form interpretations and draw conclusions about the past.
What part of speech is rebuttal?
Rebuttal is a noun. It refers to an argument or evidence presented to contradict or counter opposing points or assertions.
Which part of an essay give the evidence to support the thesis?
The body paragraphs of an essay provide the evidence to support the thesis. Each paragraph presents a different argument or piece of evidence that collectively builds a case for the main idea or argument established in the thesis statement. The evidence should be relevant, specific, and clearly connected to the thesis.
Why is providing evidence to support your position an important part of building an argument?
Providing evidence to support your position is important because it adds credibility and persuasiveness to your argument. Evidence demonstrates that your position is based on facts and logic rather than unsupported opinions. It also helps your audience better understand and accept your perspective.
Why do historians study roman assemblies and senate?
Historians do this because it is their job. There are historians who specialise in the history of Rome, just as there are historians who specialise in the history of other peoples and other historical periods. They study all aspects of Roman history, not just the assemblies and the senate. The study of these two institution is part of getting an understanding of Roman politics and society.
What are the two parts of an argument?
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
What is the part of speech for supporting detail?
Supporting detail functions as a noun, serving to provide additional information or evidence to reinforce a main idea or argument in writing.
What are the three parts of the constructive speech?
The three parts of the constructive speech are the introduction (where the speaker presents their main argument or thesis), the body (where supporting evidence and analysis are provided), and the conclusion (where the speaker summarizes key points and restates their main argument). Each part plays a crucial role in building a strong and persuasive case.
The structure of an argument can be somewhat complex The supported part of an argument is known as the?
conclusion
Why do we need evidence that god does not exist when no one has evidence that god does exist?
We do not need evidence that gods do not exist. We don't need to prove a negative. The claim there is no proof that gods do not exist is part of a fallacious argument used by some believers to balance out the lack of any evidence that gods doexist. Try not to get confused about that issue.Regarding the issue of evidence of the existence of God, please see the related question.
