0
What part of the historian's argument references specific examples of historical evidence?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution
produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones.
mrsteelfarmer
Mera🦋 Rollins
Anonymous
He refers to the execution of French royalty and the European wars that revolutionaries launched following their victory to support his argument.
Merica Baby
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which historical term describes the specific primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their claims?
Historical evidence.
Which part of the historian's argument does not rely on any historical evidence?
In his opinion, it is morally wrong for any political movement to use any violence to achieve its goals
Which element is needed for a sound argument?
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.
Can you substitute an analogy for other kinds of evidence to support points of an argument?
An analogy can be persuasive, or it can help people to understand your argument, but it isnt EVIDENCE.
Which type of evidence is most important in a persuasive argument?
the most important evidece in a persuasive argument is proof
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.
What are techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Which method separates modern historians from ancient Greek historians?
Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence
Which historical term describes the specific primary and secondary sources that historians use to support their claims?
Historical evidence.
What are both techniques historians use when synthesizing evidence?
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
Why historians use historical thinking skills?
To find answers to questions about the past using evidence
What best describes why historians use historical thinking skills?
To find answers to questions about the past using evidence.
How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Historians determine the superiority of arguments based on evidence, logical reasoning, and adherence to historical context. Arguments that are supported by primary sources, are coherent and well-reasoned, and accurately reflect the historical context are typically considered superior. It is also important to consider counterarguments and alternative perspectives in evaluating the strength of an argument.
Did Robin Hood exsist?
Maybe. Historians have traced him back to 1226 to when oral stories were told in rhyme, but there is no true historical evidence he really existed.
When should you use indirect evidence?
Indirect evidence should be used when you don't have direct or conclusive proof of a particular fact or conclusion but have supporting information that implies it. It can help build a stronger case or argument when direct evidence is lacking or ambiguous. Indirect evidence can be particularly useful in investigations, historical research, and scientific inquiries.
Which part of the historian's argument does not rely on any historical evidence?
In his opinion, it is morally wrong for any political movement to use any violence to achieve its goals
