0
How should historians determine which argument is superior if two arguments about an historical event contradict each other?
Historians should assess the evidence supporting each argument, consider the credibility of the sources, and evaluate the context in which the arguments were made. They may also look for consensus among other historians or seek additional evidence to support one argument over the other. Ultimately, the argument that is best supported by a preponderance of evidence and critical analysis is considered superior.
What else can I help you with?
How should historians determine which argument is superior?
I have the feeling that your question may be part of a series of questions that were put to you. So there is a risk in giving an answer out of the context of your homework assignment. But generally speaking, the strongest argument in any historical debate will be the one where facts and assumed motives can be supported by contemporary factual and documentary evidence; the more, the better.
What does corroborating sources allow a political scientist to do?
determine whether an assertion made by one source is likely to be true.
Will the Bush Administration go down in history as the most corrupt to date?
Because of the No Child Left Behind Act, the largest unfunded Federal Mandate in the history of the United States, he could go down in history. Like most other presidents, some are remembered. However, he maybe could be one that is not remembered (such as William H. Harrison, Martin Van Buren, etc.). Well, we'll see soon!
What power enables the Supreme Court to determine the constitutionality of government actions?
The power that enables the Supreme Court to determine the constitutionality of government actions is called judicial review. This authority allows the Court to interpret the Constitution and decide if laws or actions by the government are in line with its principles.
What is a good sentence for elector?
You become an elector once you get the right to vote.
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.
Which term describes a clearly stated argument supporting a particular point of view?
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
What term describes a clearly stated argument supporting a particular point of view?
Two arguments about a historical event contradict each other. How should historians determine which argument is superior?
How should historians determine which argument is superior?
I have the feeling that your question may be part of a series of questions that were put to you. So there is a risk in giving an answer out of the context of your homework assignment. But generally speaking, the strongest argument in any historical debate will be the one where facts and assumed motives can be supported by contemporary factual and documentary evidence; the more, the better.
Did Pythagoras have any brothers or sisters?
There is no reliable historical record that allows historians to determine whether or not Pythagoras had any siblings.
What are the 5 criteria for historical reliability?
1) Find a problem. 2) Form a hypothesis. 3) Conduct research a) Determine authenticity b) Determine significance 4) Make arguments and conclusions 5) Share knowledge http://staff.kings.edu/bapavlac/evalsources.html
How can I determine the construction date of a building?
To determine the construction date of a building, you can start by looking for building permits, historical records, architectural features, and consulting with local historians or experts.
What do historians do when using the historical thinking of chronological thinking?
Answer this questio A historian using the historical thinking skill of chronological thinking might: n…
Which historical thinking skill is the historian using?
The historian is likely using the skill of sourcing, which involves examining the origin of information to determine its credibility and relevance to the historical narrative. By identifying the sources of historical information, historians can better evaluate the context and perspective from which the information is presented.
What do historians do when using the historical thinking skills of evaluating interpretations?
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
Ask us of the following arguments is an argument of consequence?
Can you provide the arguments so that I can determine if it is an argument of consequence?
To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable historians generally?
Answer this question… check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other sources.
