In his opinion, it is morally wrong for any political movement to use any violence to achieve its goals
Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones.
Historians should be capitalized when it is used as part of a proper noun, such as when referring to a specific group or organization like the American Historical Association. However, when used generically to refer to individuals who study or write about history, it is not capitalized. For example, "Many historians attended the conference" would not capitalize historians, but "The Historians' Society hosted a symposium" would capitalize it.
That would be a moot point
Historical is an adjective.
Evidence is a noun.
I have the feeling that your question may be part of a series of questions that were put to you. So there is a risk in giving an answer out of the context of your homework assignment. But generally speaking, the strongest argument in any historical debate will be the one where facts and assumed motives can be supported by contemporary factual and documentary evidence; the more, the better.
Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones.
Yes, gathering information is a crucial part of the historical thinking process. It involves examining multiple sources, evaluating their reliability, and analyzing the evidence to construct an accurate narrative of past events. This process helps historians form interpretations and draw conclusions about the past.
Rebuttal is a noun. It refers to an argument or evidence presented to contradict or counter opposing points or assertions.
The body paragraphs of an essay provide the evidence to support the thesis. Each paragraph presents a different argument or piece of evidence that collectively builds a case for the main idea or argument established in the thesis statement. The evidence should be relevant, specific, and clearly connected to the thesis.
Historians should be capitalized when it is used as part of a proper noun, such as when referring to a specific group or organization like the American Historical Association. However, when used generically to refer to individuals who study or write about history, it is not capitalized. For example, "Many historians attended the conference" would not capitalize historians, but "The Historians' Society hosted a symposium" would capitalize it.
There are historical records and legends that suggest Princess Urduja existed in the 14th century in a region that is now part of the Philippines. However, there is also debate among historians about the extent of her kingdom and her actual existence due to limited concrete evidence.
Providing evidence to support your position is important because it adds credibility and persuasiveness to your argument. Evidence demonstrates that your position is based on facts and logic rather than unsupported opinions. It also helps your audience better understand and accept your perspective.
Historians do this because it is their job. There are historians who specialise in the history of Rome, just as there are historians who specialise in the history of other peoples and other historical periods. They study all aspects of Roman history, not just the assemblies and the senate. The study of these two institution is part of getting an understanding of Roman politics and society.
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
Supporting detail functions as a noun, serving to provide additional information or evidence to reinforce a main idea or argument in writing.
conclusion