the Bill of Rights wasn't originally mentioned in Philadelphia. The Anti-Federalists later proposed it. They attacked the Constitution because it was vague and did not provide any kind of protection against tyranny. The Anti-Federalists wanted, rather demanded, that the Constitution lay out the rights of the people and LIMIT the power government. After the ratification, very few of the delegates thought that what they had just signed was the IDEAL form of government.
Soooo... what I'm saying is that they were trying to limit the power of government and protect the people from tyranny, and provide the people with their rights. They were also trying to form the ideal form of government.
It protected freedoms
descent with modification
Sound bite
you gave me the wrong answer nitwit
Sound bite
NovaNet answer: to protect and promote workers' rights
NovaNET answer: To protect & promote workers' rights
to protect an dpromote workers' rights <nova net> WWFIRE
The possessive noun phrase is the fathers' rights.
The possessive noun phrase is the fathers' rights.
To protect and promote workers rights Since workers had no statutory rights at the time, that phrase makes no sense. Unions attempted to give members a voice in decisions about pay and work conditions.
To protect and promote workers rights Since workers had no statutory rights at the time, that phrase makes no sense. Unions attempted to give members a voice in decisions about pay and work conditions.
To protect and promote workers rights Since workers had no statutory rights at the time, that phrase makes no sense. Unions attempted to give members a voice in decisions about pay and work conditions.