Want this question answered?
You have to be able to contradict your opponent's argument...tell the truth, and make sure your argument is a fact, not an opinion !!! take your opponent's argument, and find the cons (like the disadvantages) about it, then add another argument... But the most important thing is to always remain calm...Show passion for what you are debating, but don't get carried away !!! Think of what you are going to say before you open your mouth !!!
The colonists' argument has important strengths, but it has its shortcomings and this representation justified Parliament's continuing jurisdiction over them.
Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 that were really convincing was his argument in favour of parliamentary reform. Thank you very much, but what exactly is his argument. I'm reading over the Bill and just cannot understand what his argument actually is.
If you are referring to ancient Rome, there was not an anti-imperialist argument.
The possible harm to the balance of nature is more important than a gain in energy
the most important evidece in a persuasive argument is proof
unified argument
It is very important to examine the evidence of an argument in order to come to a valid conclusion for said argument. If one does not have all the evidence, an invalid conclusion could be made.
Thoreau's argument is important because in order to serve the tate you must have dignity
Because the tone you use can either draw an audience into your argument or alienate them.
Randomizing the unwanted variables is one method of building a stronger causal argument. Controlling or a strong attempt at controlling the unwanted variables would be recommended. One variable, and only one should remain independent; this would ensure the dependent variable could be assessed in the proper light. Eliminating unwanted confounding variables my be necessary for a stronger causal argument; the confounding variables distort the conclusion in the causal argument. Eliminating unwanted variables could mean categorising data; it could mean separating data; it could mean some guess work, such as adding/subtracting figures like a statistician.
Civil :) -Apex-
mentions exports and important people to support the argument
In the books of Genesis, Exodus and Leviticus, the most important idea or argument in these books is that "in the beginning, God created".
For an argument to be valid, it means that if the premises of the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. Validity has to do with the form of the argument. If one or more of the premises are not true, that does not mean the argument isn't valid. Soundness means that the argument is valid, and all of it's premises are true. It's a little redundant to say "both valid and sound", because if your argument is sound, then it must be valid. It is important for an argument to be not just valid, but also sound, in order for it to be convincing.
The most important question in evaluating an argument is whether the author provided sufficient evidence to support their claims, followed by assessing the logic and reasoning used. Tone can influence how the argument is perceived but is not the most crucial factor in determining its validity or strength.
The most important concern is the impact of the statement on the jury.