Which theory explains why our universe is structured and uniform and suggests that the universe is flat in shape?

Answer 1

God made it. It must be noted that this is not considered a scientific theory, for although God may very well exist--we lack physical evidence to prove that assertion.

___________

Can there be a creationist theory?

Technically, there is not nor can there ever be something called 'creationist theory'. Creationist theory is the purest example of oxymoron. Please read on; this is not a diatribe and it is not meant to incite riots among believers. In the general sciences, theory by its very nature is never considered to be beyond re-evaluation. The more fundamental theories, the ones that are the foundations of belief about the most basic structures and processes of the natural world, cannot ever be considered proven beyond all possible doubt and proven for all time. Theory (of this most basic and fundamental kind) by its nature can always be overturned, and theories often are. These upheavals of basic theory are often accompanied by intense disputes and fighting among scientists, many of whom have built their reputations on developing the threatened and possibly toppled theory. This is the way science goes. Perhaps more accurately, this is how human beings who do science behave.

How can there be a theory that the universe is created, and then have that 'theory' examined in a framework that allows the theoretical possibility that it can be overturned? If one believes in creation, then creation is simply the only option, based on faith alone. Whether or not there is a creative force behind the universe is and forever will be a matter of faith, and not theory, experimentation or evidence. People of faith who want 'scientific proof' are thinking wrongly that messy, imperfect and always changing science will somehow positively impact their faith. Evidence and faith are not easily compatible when you get right down to the meat of it. You either believe on the basis of faith alone, and the raging scientists can have there data; or you do not believe, and you seek knowledge based on what the evidence generated by the ever-shifting scientific landscape tells you.

People who have a passion for science should go for it with all their strength. If creation is true, then science done accurately and interpreted honestly will probably not diverge from the truth of creation. There is always the familiar counter-argument that the creative force put things in place in such a way that would intentionally confound naturalist science. This is really another argument (from faith) that science is profoundly unreliable, and not a suitable arena to debate the strengths and benefits of faith. Being a believer-scientist may lead you to take interest in any number of questions about how science is done and how data are analyzed. But being a believer-scientist should NEVER lead you to the conclusion first, before a matter is exhaustively studied. That would be preaching, not science.

Statement of the creationist theory

Whether or not the arguments above have any merit, it remains that creationist theorists and scientists have yet to come up with any kind of coherent theoretical statement (beyond 'God made it' or the self-proclaimed and unsupportable "laws" of Intelligent Design) that is anything like acceptable science. Creationist Theory remains a byword for the Wedge agenda and for religious conservatives who wish to dominate the secular education and political systems in the US and abroad; if there is a statement of creationist theory, this comes close to it. It is socio-politics and not science.

Answer 2

Three theories have been put forth by the sceintists so far.

Steady state theory

Big bang theory

Pulsating theory

Out of these Big bang theory claims a deep understanding about the energy and intelligence. Usually all of us say that intelligence is not energy. But energy can have intelligence! Let us go deeper. All the best.

Answer 3

There are several different hypotheses put forward by various different groups who support creationism in one form or other. What they have in common, so what we might call the creationist theory, is that they believe that God created the world in accordance with their particular interpretation of the Book of Genesis.

Creationists tend to support one of two versions of creationism - 'Young Earth' creationism, in which the world is regarded as only a few thousand years old, and 'Old Earth' creationism, which accepts the scientific evidence that the world is immensely old and tries to harmonise that with the Book of Genesis. Some Old Earth creationists go as far as to define guided evolution, in which God uses evolution to create the species that now exist. Note that although 'guided evolution' recognises the fact of evolution, it is contrary to the facts of science. Other Old Earth creationists have developed the concept of 'Intelligent Design'.

For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation

Answer 4

It is widespread tradition, not mere theory. It states that the universe is the result of deliberate creation, not random events. See also:

Is there any evidence for Creation or against Evolution?

Answer 5

The name for the current theory for the formation of the universe is the Big Bang Theory.

Answer 6

The big bang theory which is a theory of cosmology holding that the expansion of the universe began with a gigantic explosion between 12 and 20 billion years ago

Answer 7

The current leading theory of the origin of the universe is called "The Big Bang Theory".

Answer 8

the accepted theory is the "big bang theory"

Answer 9

The theory of the formaton of the universe that enjoys the boradest scientific acceptance is the Big Bang theory.

Answer 10

big bang theory