m/s
Objects moving at constant speed in a straight line are said to be in equilibrium. That is there is no force acting on them. If a force was acting there would be aceleration and the velocity would change.
It is rather subtle. In general yes, if there is no air resistance (or any comparable force) all objects will fall down at the same speed. However this is only strictly true if the masses of the objects are small compared to that of the Earth. This is because we generally attach our coordinate system to the Earth, so if the Earth moves upwards we do not measure it, instead appearing to us as if the object fell down quicker. This is just a consequence of a badly chosen reference frame of course. As an example one would not expect a tea cup to fall down at the same speed as the Moon, because the Moon would actually also pull the Earth towards it. Again if we would properly attach our coordinate system to some place that will remain at rest all objects fall with the same speed.
Acceleration is the change in an ogjects speed or a change in an objects direction of motion or both of these. If instead of speed you use the word velocity , which is both an object's speed and its direction of motion, then you could say "acceleration is the change in an objects velocity" and that would cover all the possibilities in one statement.
No, it would slow objects down. Resistance implies that the water is acting against the object's motion, slowing it down.
The friction (with the air molecules) would slow it down.
Objects moving at constant speed in a straight line are said to be in equilibrium. That is there is no force acting on them. If a force was acting there would be aceleration and the velocity would change.
x and y
I'm uncertain about what you are seeking here. The change in an objects speed divided by the time required to change the speed would be the average acceleration.
It is rather subtle. In general yes, if there is no air resistance (or any comparable force) all objects will fall down at the same speed. However this is only strictly true if the masses of the objects are small compared to that of the Earth. This is because we generally attach our coordinate system to the Earth, so if the Earth moves upwards we do not measure it, instead appearing to us as if the object fell down quicker. This is just a consequence of a badly chosen reference frame of course. As an example one would not expect a tea cup to fall down at the same speed as the Moon, because the Moon would actually also pull the Earth towards it. Again if we would properly attach our coordinate system to some place that will remain at rest all objects fall with the same speed.
Acceleration is the change in an ogjects speed or a change in an objects direction of motion or both of these. If instead of speed you use the word velocity , which is both an object's speed and its direction of motion, then you could say "acceleration is the change in an objects velocity" and that would cover all the possibilities in one statement.
No, it would slow objects down. Resistance implies that the water is acting against the object's motion, slowing it down.
The friction (with the air molecules) would slow it down.
v = d/t would be Speed is Distance / Time(more properly for physics)Velocity is Displacement / Time
If they have the same engine, it would bolt up. But if it is a 4 speed, the electrical plugs are different, so it would not work properly.If they have the same engine, it would bolt up. But if it is a 4 speed, the electrical plugs are different, so it would not work properly.
I have ran into aftermarket wheel bearings that the speed sensors do not read properly.I have ran into aftermarket wheel bearings that the speed sensors do not read properly.
Try it. That's what's known as an experiment.
How fast something moves is the speed. Airplanes are one of fastest moving objects in the world, and cheetahs are one of the fastest animals.