Want this question answered?
Lead brick
Well it doesn't weigh 10 lbs! Ordinarily, a brick would be considered incompressible, and that is still probable in 5000 ft of water. And assuming that it had no entrained air! BUT, water at 5000 ft is compressible (for which you'll have to look up an hydrology table) and the volume of water displaced by the brick will now weigh more than that volume would have had at the surface. And as soon as you have immersed your brick, it will weigh less than it previously did, by the weight of water it displaced. remember Archimedes? SO your brick would now be slightly more buoyant (weigh less) than it did close to the surface. In an exam answer, one would usually say 'assuming the brick is incompressible', and 'assume the brick is impermeable'. Of course you could also 'assume that water is incompressible', and eliminate the hydrology tables! Then proceed with the answer.
Neither. Since they both have a weight of 1kg (kilogram) one cannot be heavier than the other.
Depending on the type of brick it is, most bricks weigh about 800 grams.
You mean which one does it travel faster in? It would be a brick because of how tightly packed the molecules in the brick are together. Wood, which is a lot more fragile that brick, does not allow sound to travel through it as fast.
Each full brick would weigh 16kg.
Lead brick
Well it doesn't weigh 10 lbs! Ordinarily, a brick would be considered incompressible, and that is still probable in 5000 ft of water. And assuming that it had no entrained air! BUT, water at 5000 ft is compressible (for which you'll have to look up an hydrology table) and the volume of water displaced by the brick will now weigh more than that volume would have had at the surface. And as soon as you have immersed your brick, it will weigh less than it previously did, by the weight of water it displaced. remember Archimedes? SO your brick would now be slightly more buoyant (weigh less) than it did close to the surface. In an exam answer, one would usually say 'assuming the brick is incompressible', and 'assume the brick is impermeable'. Of course you could also 'assume that water is incompressible', and eliminate the hydrology tables! Then proceed with the answer.
Assuming the standard size of a red clay brick 4"x8"x2-1/4", (1) CY of bricks would weight 6,912 lbs, or 3.46 tons.
they both weigh an ounce so they weigh the same This is not the correct answer...DuFuss. Gold is weighed in troy weight, one troy ounce = 480 grains= 31.2 grams. Brick would be measured in avoirdupois weight, where 1 ounce=437.5 grains or 28.4 grams. Therefore, an ounce of gold weighs more than a ounce of brick, feathers, lead, etc.
Neither. Since they both have a weight of 1kg (kilogram) one cannot be heavier than the other.
Depending on the type of brick it is, most bricks weigh about 800 grams.
Anywhere in the universe where there was some net gravitational force: however weak or strong.
it would be the brick because the brick has more matter because it weighs more.
if it would brick you wii, nobody sell it i think it will not brick your wii
A brick would be lighter.
On a per-foot basis, it would be the thickness of the wall in feet multiplied by the height in feet multiplied by the combined density of the brick and mortar. My AISC manual has 120 lbs per cubic foot for a normal brick wall, so a typical single wythe wall (4" thick) would weigh 40 lbs square foot of face area.