His eldest son Jahangir succeeded Akbar (1605-1627).
Akbar was a successful ruler as most of the subcontinents population was Hindu, he changed Islamic religion policies and was more influenced by Hinduism and even married many Hindu women. A+ all of the answers are correct
she became a ruler
Sunni Ali, who became ruler of the Songhai in 1464, worked to unify, strengthen, and enlarge his empire.
They were Muslim rulers. Akbar the Great was the great ruler of the Mughal dynasty of India (1556-1605). Suleiman the Magnificent's reign is known as the golden age of the Ottoman Empire of Turkey (1520-1566). Shah Abbas was the greatest ruler of the Safavid dynasty of Persia (1588-1629). Mehmed the Conqueror was the celebrated Sultan of the Ottoman Empire from 1444-46 & 1451-1481, who conquered Istanbul on 29th May 1453.
Engand & France were becoming nations unified under a single ruler.
Jalal-ul-Din Muhammad Akbar [Akbar the Great became the King at the age of 11]
Akbar
humayun
akbar
akbar the great
akbar
Akbar
akbar
Emperor Akbar, the Mughal ruler of India, had three sons: Crown Prince Salim (who later became Emperor Jahangir), Murad Mirza, and Daniyal Mirza. Jahangir succeeded Akbar as the emperor of the Mughal Empire.
Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.
akbar.
akbar