answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

During the monarchy the kings made the rules. During the republic, technically, the people made the rules (laws). How it worked, at least ideally, is the senate consulted and discussed a proposal and then if they agreed on it, they put it before the assemblies and they voted it into law. However this was not always practical, as some regulations had to be enacted quickly, so the senate could pass a resolution which had the same force as a law. During the principate, the emperor made the rules.

During the monarchy the kings made the rules. During the republic, technically, the people made the rules (laws). How it worked, at least ideally, is the senate consulted and discussed a proposal and then if they agreed on it, they put it before the assemblies and they voted it into law. However this was not always practical, as some regulations had to be enacted quickly, so the senate could pass a resolution which had the same force as a law. During the principate, the emperor made the rules.

During the monarchy the kings made the rules. During the republic, technically, the people made the rules (laws). How it worked, at least ideally, is the senate consulted and discussed a proposal and then if they agreed on it, they put it before the assemblies and they voted it into law. However this was not always practical, as some regulations had to be enacted quickly, so the senate could pass a resolution which had the same force as a law. During the principate, the emperor made the rules.

During the monarchy the kings made the rules. During the republic, technically, the people made the rules (laws). How it worked, at least ideally, is the senate consulted and discussed a proposal and then if they agreed on it, they put it before the assemblies and they voted it into law. However this was not always practical, as some regulations had to be enacted quickly, so the senate could pass a resolution which had the same force as a law. During the principate, the emperor made the rules.

During the monarchy the kings made the rules. During the republic, technically, the people made the rules (laws). How it worked, at least ideally, is the senate consulted and discussed a proposal and then if they agreed on it, they put it before the assemblies and they voted it into law. However this was not always practical, as some regulations had to be enacted quickly, so the senate could pass a resolution which had the same force as a law. During the principate, the emperor made the rules.

During the monarchy the kings made the rules. During the republic, technically, the people made the rules (laws). How it worked, at least ideally, is the senate consulted and discussed a proposal and then if they agreed on it, they put it before the assemblies and they voted it into law. However this was not always practical, as some regulations had to be enacted quickly, so the senate could pass a resolution which had the same force as a law. During the principate, the emperor made the rules.

During the monarchy the kings made the rules. During the republic, technically, the people made the rules (laws). How it worked, at least ideally, is the senate consulted and discussed a proposal and then if they agreed on it, they put it before the assemblies and they voted it into law. However this was not always practical, as some regulations had to be enacted quickly, so the senate could pass a resolution which had the same force as a law. During the principate, the emperor made the rules.

During the monarchy the kings made the rules. During the republic, technically, the people made the rules (laws). How it worked, at least ideally, is the senate consulted and discussed a proposal and then if they agreed on it, they put it before the assemblies and they voted it into law. However this was not always practical, as some regulations had to be enacted quickly, so the senate could pass a resolution which had the same force as a law. During the principate, the emperor made the rules.

During the monarchy the kings made the rules. During the republic, technically, the people made the rules (laws). How it worked, at least ideally, is the senate consulted and discussed a proposal and then if they agreed on it, they put it before the assemblies and they voted it into law. However this was not always practical, as some regulations had to be enacted quickly, so the senate could pass a resolution which had the same force as a law. During the principate, the emperor made the rules.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

In the Early Republic the consuls proposed bills. In the Mid and Late Republic the plebeian tribunes proposed bills. The praetor also played an important role in the development of Roman law.

The praetors were the second highest ranking officers of state, and were like chiefs justices. They presided over trials or handed them over to a iudex (judge) who was not a professional, but was an unpaid private person chosen from a list (album) drawn up according to wealth. The praetors also issued the Praetor's Edict, which stated the praetors' policy on judicial matters for their term of office (one year). Praetors endorsed much of the content of previous edicts, thus ensuring continuity. Although praetors were not legislators and could not introduce new laws, they could make amendments. These introduced needed innovations. Therefore, the development an improvement of Roman law owed a lot to the praetors. Since the praetors were politicians, not lawyers, they often submitted consulta (written questions) to jurists (legal experts) and their replies were often used for the compilation of the edicts

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

During the monarchy the kings made the rules. During the republic, technically, the people made the rules (laws). How it worked, at least ideally, is the senate consulted and discussed a proposal and then if they agreed on it, they put it before the assemblies and they voted it into law. However this was not always practical, as some regulations had to be enacted quickly, so the senate could pass a resolution which had the same force as a law. During the principate, the emperor made the rules.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

the EMPERORS made the decisions in the Roman Empire

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The one who created the laws of the roman empire was their first ruler Augustus.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Caesars, Emperors, Generals, rich people and the Senate ruled Rome until they got a stable government in the Renaissance period.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Which group in ancient Rome made the rules and laws?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

The Twelve Tables were the written laws of what?

ancient Rome


What are the injury laws in ancient rome?

The ancient Romans did not have injury laws.


What were Rome's laws?

some laws of Rome were no stealing, and face your consequence's and alot of modern day rules and laws


What are 72 tables in ancient rome?

there were only twelve tables in ancient rome and they were Rome's written laws and were placed in the forum


What kinds of laws did ancient Rome have?

Ancient Rome's laws are very similar to the ones we have today. The rules were all put in the Twelve Tables. The subjects were courts and trials, debts, rights of fathers over the family, legal guardianship and inheritance, buying and owning things, rights to land, laws about injuring others, public laws, sacred laws, and Supplements I & II.


What were the laws of the twelve tables?

ancient Rome


What were The twelve tables written laws of?

ancient Rome


Which of the following are laws NOT associated with ancient Rome?

You need to say what the following laws are.


Did ancient Rome get the ideas of creating the government and laws from the U.S.?

No. It was the other way around. The United States got its ideas from ancient Rome.


How were the cities of ancient Rome run by government?

By the Senate and the Emperor, decided on laws.


The US based many of its laws on these books from Ancient Rome What are they?

Justinian's codes.


How is the Legacy of Rome shown itself in America?

The legacy of Rome is shown in the architecture of our nation's capitol and in our legal concepts. Note that they are legal concepts not the laws themselves as ancient Rome and America are different nations existing in different times.The legacy of Rome is shown in the architecture of our nation's capitol and in our legal concepts. Note that they are legal concepts not the laws themselves as ancient Rome and America are different nations existing in different times.The legacy of Rome is shown in the architecture of our nation's capitol and in our legal concepts. Note that they are legal concepts not the laws themselves as ancient Rome and America are different nations existing in different times.The legacy of Rome is shown in the architecture of our nation's capitol and in our legal concepts. Note that they are legal concepts not the laws themselves as ancient Rome and America are different nations existing in different times.The legacy of Rome is shown in the architecture of our nation's capitol and in our legal concepts. Note that they are legal concepts not the laws themselves as ancient Rome and America are different nations existing in different times.The legacy of Rome is shown in the architecture of our nation's capitol and in our legal concepts. Note that they are legal concepts not the laws themselves as ancient Rome and America are different nations existing in different times.The legacy of Rome is shown in the architecture of our nation's capitol and in our legal concepts. Note that they are legal concepts not the laws themselves as ancient Rome and America are different nations existing in different times.The legacy of Rome is shown in the architecture of our nation's capitol and in our legal concepts. Note that they are legal concepts not the laws themselves as ancient Rome and America are different nations existing in different times.The legacy of Rome is shown in the architecture of our nation's capitol and in our legal concepts. Note that they are legal concepts not the laws themselves as ancient Rome and America are different nations existing in different times.