0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In what way were serfs bound to the soil?
Most peasants were serfs. Serfs were people who could not lawfully leave the place where they were born. Though bound to the land, serfs were not slaves. If a lord transferred ownership of land, the serfs went with it. Their lords could not sell or buy them, but most of what their labor produced belonged to the lord.
Who owns Manor Farm?
Land ownership in the modern sense was very rare in the middle ages. When land is clearly owned by a single party is called "fee simple", but there was almost no fee simple property in the middle ages. Instead, for any given land there were multiple people who had rights and responsibilities relating to that land. The farmland of a particular manor was held by some kind of feudal land lord. In some cases this lord was a great lord like a king or duke. In many cases it was a lesser lord who had received the land from the greater lord in exchange for promises of loyalty, military service, or possibly monetary payments in place of the military service. In some cases the process was repeated more than once, with a given manor being passed as a fief down through a chain of lords and vassals. The lord that directly holds the manor retains some of the farm land to generate goods and income for himself, and the remainder of the land was given over to the peasants of the manor for their use. The peasant who received land from the lord would owe rents, fees, and if the peasant was a serf or villein, labor on the lords land. In exchange the peasant was entitled to the lord's protection and justice. The peasants worked the lands that they held from the lord for their own livelihood.
What is the difference between a peasant and serf and slave?
They are similar but peasants are free and owe the land they work. Another difference is that serfs didn't have the same rights as peasants did, serfs had less. They had to pay allegiance to the lord of the area. A serf on the other hand did not pay their "dues" so they are forced to stay on the land, but owed allegiance to the lord of the manor, as an agricultural worker.
What possibilities existed for Serfs escaping from the Manor?
Usually, if a serf wanted to leave the manor, he could find a way to do so fairly easily. We read of serfs buying their freedom. I have no doubt that this happened, but I would be surprised if it happened very often. This is not be cause serfs usually did not have enough money, but because serfs usually had less expensive ways to do things. In some places, serfs were encouraged to leave manors by laws giving them refuge in communities a king wanted more heavily populated. Other laws said that if a serf was missing from a manor for a year, he was regarded as free. In some places, the lords of the manors did things to make the serfs leave of their own accord. This happened because the lords wanted to do such things as appropriate common land for their own use, and did not want to have to put up with the problems that would develop from the serfs. The thing to remember was that the serf was tied to the land, not the lord. The manorial obligations were mutual, between the serf and his lord. The serf had a legal obligation not to move away, but the lord had a legal obligation to allow him to live on the manor. The serf lacked a level of freedom, but he had a guarantee of a job, a home, and a certain amount of protection in times of trouble or famine. When a serf moved away, it freed both the serf and the lord from those obligations. There were times of trouble, when free men and women were glad to give up their freedom in order to gain the security of serfdom. And this was possibly the one thing the kept the serfs most firmly tied to their manors.
What is a manor how does the manorial system work?
A manor is the basic unit of feudal land holding. Often a manor was comprised of one village, but in some cases a manor might include several villages, or in rare cases the lands of a particular village might be divided between more than one manor. For simplicity lets assume we have a manor that includes a single village. The village was a small settlement that ranged in size from a few as 50 to as many as 500 people, but on average was home to 200 to 300 people. The village consisted of a cluster of houses and a few other buildings such as a church, a mill, etc. The village was surrounded by three large areas of fields, each surrounded by a combinations of hedges and fences. The large open fields were divided into areas called furlongs, where were further divided into strips of farmland. Some of these strips were held by the lord, others were held by farmers in the village. There would have also been areas for pasturing animals, meadows for growing hay, and waste areas for gathering natural resources such as wood, peat, rushes, thatch, etc. The peasants of the village can in two types, free and serfs, also called villeins. Free villagers would have owed an annual rent based on the amount of land they held, and certain taxes and fees, but did not owe labor to the lord, or only a token amount. A free man could leave the manor if he so chose, and would serve as a member of the manor court. Villeins were bondsmen. In addition to rents and taxes they owed labor to the lord, the amount of which varied by location but it could be up to two days per week. This time was spent working the lord's farmland in the village fields. The produce from these farms was a major source of income for the aristocracy. The other days of the week they worked their own land in the village fields, which provided for their basic needs and generated a small surplus to sell. Villeins could travel short distances to nearby market towns, but could not permanently leave the manor without permission, although this was sometimes arranged in exchange for an annual fee. Villeins should not be confused with slaves, however. Villeins could own their own houses and movable property to which the lord had no claim, and were free to accumulate wealth if they found the means to do so. A villein could not be sold to another lord, nor could they be denied access to their land. A villein could bring a complaint to the manor court, and were not chattel. While not fully free, they had considerable rights. Not all peasants had the same level of wealth. The poorest, who were known as cotters or cottagers, held only a house, a small farmyard, and a garden of an acre of less. This was inadequate to provide for their needs and they would have to hire out as labor to support themselves. A peasant who controlled 10-12 acres probably could provide for their own basic needs. Some peasants controlled thirty for forty acres, in rare cases even more, and would have generated significant surplus to bring to market. Also, being free was not always equated with greater wealth, nor were villeins always poor. Some villeins did well enough financially to hire others to replace them for their labor obligations, and there are even records of villeins with enough wealth to hire servants. Most people in a village farmed. There would have been a few professionals or craftsmen, the most common being a miller and a blacksmith. These people sometimes also farmed as well as practicing their craft. Most villages were withing a day round trip of a town with a market. The smallest of these towns were not necessarily any larger than a village, but their economy was focused on trade and crafts. They had regular market days and would have been an opportunity for the peasants to sell their surplus and buy manufactured goods they could not acquire in the village.
What duties did a lord of a manor and his owe one another?
Serf's duties... *work the lord's land (the demense) *due a varying number of days labor on the manor of the lord. *Frequently owed military service (not always) *Swear absolute loyalty to the lord *Pay taxes and fees required by the lord *Only leave the manor with the lord's permission {in short, work to keep the manor running} Lord's Duties *Protect his serfs from attack *Settle disputes between serfs *Conduct trials and punish criminals {in short, manage the economic and social aspects of the manor inluding policing and military protection
What duties did the lord of manor and his serfs owe each other?
The serfs were supposed to work on the manor and do whatever their superiors told them to do. The lord was supposed to allow his manor as a place of protection for the serfs - during the time of feudalism, this was very much needed - and a place to live. The lords got the better end of the deal.
What duties did a lord of a manor and his serfs owe one another?
Serfs were required to work the lord's land for food, as well as taxes and manor labor. The lord was a general governor of his people, set to protect the serfs and settle disputes between them.
In what way were serfs bound to the soil?
Most peasants were serfs. Serfs were people who could not lawfully leave the place where they were born. Though bound to the land, serfs were not slaves. If a lord transferred ownership of land, the serfs went with it. Their lords could not sell or buy them, but most of what their labor produced belonged to the lord.
Who owns Manor Farm?
Land ownership in the modern sense was very rare in the middle ages. When land is clearly owned by a single party is called "fee simple", but there was almost no fee simple property in the middle ages. Instead, for any given land there were multiple people who had rights and responsibilities relating to that land. The farmland of a particular manor was held by some kind of feudal land lord. In some cases this lord was a great lord like a king or duke. In many cases it was a lesser lord who had received the land from the greater lord in exchange for promises of loyalty, military service, or possibly monetary payments in place of the military service. In some cases the process was repeated more than once, with a given manor being passed as a fief down through a chain of lords and vassals. The lord that directly holds the manor retains some of the farm land to generate goods and income for himself, and the remainder of the land was given over to the peasants of the manor for their use. The peasant who received land from the lord would owe rents, fees, and if the peasant was a serf or villein, labor on the lords land. In exchange the peasant was entitled to the lord's protection and justice. The peasants worked the lands that they held from the lord for their own livelihood.
How do you use the word owe in a sentence?
She said that they owe her two dollars for that book. I owe, I owe; so it's off to work I go.
If you owe hospital bills will hospitals work with you if you are out of work?
no
What are manorial dues?
Manorial dues are the fees that peasants or serfs of farmer owe to the noble who is their landlord. the Lord of the Manor, in exchange for giving you land on which you make a living, essentially charges rent. this is the cornerstone of feudalism.
Who did Charlie Daniels owe two million dollars?
To the lord and all his followers after he had sold his sole to the devil.
Is it true the the serfs were not able to own the land they farmed?
Serfs did not own land. They lived and worked on manors owned by members of the nobility. 2nd answer: That is only partially accurate. Serfs did not own land in the modern sense. But many did have rights to a certain amount of farmland in the field of the manor they resided on. They owed the lord some combination of rents, fees, and labor for this land, but by tradition and practice a serf could not be deprived of the land he held from the lord. Serfs were not slaves. They could not be bought or sold, or forced to leave their holdings. They were not fully free either, as they did owe an amount of labor to their lord, as well as rents and various payments in kind. The lord of the manor did not really "own" the land of the manor either. The lord might hold this land from a greater lord, and in exchange owe military service or money in exchange. Much like the serf, the lord of the manor could not be arbitrarily deprived of his holding, but he had duties and responsibilities regarding it. So for any given piece of land, there were several people who had both some claim and also responsibility relating to that land. There was very little if any "fee simple" property, to use the modern legal term, in the middle ages, meaning property that was clearly owned by one person without outside duties or encumbrances.
You still owe me for the work that I did on your car last summer What is the subject and what is the verv?
You have a compound sentence. (You) is the subject. (Still owe) is the verb. (That) is the conjunction. (I) is the subject. (Did) is the verb.
What is the first thing Legolas says in Lord of the Rings - The Fellowship of the Ring?
"This is no mere Ranger. He is Aragorn, son of Arathorn. You owe him your allegiance"
