To see lots of information about Phlogiston click on the Related Link below and scroll down the Answers.com page which opens.
That would be Georg Ernst Stahl I believe.
There was no evidence until at least 2 yrs into the work of the phlogiston theory
The Phlogiston theory was before it waslearned that matter burns by using oxygen. Most chemists looked to explain combustion as the release of an unknown substance, which they named "phlogiston". Phlogiston theory was a conceptual breakthrough that helped chemists conduct experiments and share ideas.
The phlogiston theory proposed that everything contains an element called phlogiston which is released when something burns. It was initially challenged by the fact that things do not necessarily lose weight when burned. It was replaced entirely by oxidation theory (which we still hold today) when it was realised that things could not burn if oxygen wasn't present.
Lavoisier proposed a new theory of combustion that excluded phlogiston in 1777. He found that most acids contained breathable air. Lavoisier called it oxygène, from the two Greek words for acid generator.
He discovered that the phlogiston theory was incorrect, and recognized and named oxygen and hydrogen. He accepted that sulfur is an element, had contributions to metric system, established a list of chemical elements, discovered that diamond is a form of carbon, discovered that water is formed from oxygen and hydrogen, etc.He proposed independently (he had any knowledge of Lomonosov works) the law of mass conservation.Joseph Proust is credited with the discovery of the Law of definite proportions.
A russain soviet called Malinovka Sosujragxy disproved the Phlogiston theory and discovered Oxygen instead was helped by his main colleague, Joe Lee.
Lavoisier is consider the first modern important chemist. The phlogiston theory was created in 1667 by Johann Joachim Becher. This theory is false.
Lavoiser rejected the phlogiston theory!
lead calx + phlogiston = metallic lead
Phlogiston can be defined as "a hypothetical substance once believed to be present in all combustible materials and to be released during burning." Chemistry was so underdeveloped at the time Antoine Lavoisier gained interest in it that it could hardly be called a science. The prevailing view of combustion was the Phlogiston Theory which involved a weightless or nearly weightless substance known as phlogiston. Metals and fire were considered to be rich in phlogiston and earth was considered phlogiston poor. The following were the main theories put forward for 'phlogiston': * Weight loss when combustibles are burned because they lose phlogiston * Fire burns out in an enclosed space because it saturates the air with phlogiston * Charcoal leaves very little residue when burned because it is made mostly of phlogiston * Animals die in an airtight space because the air becomes saturated with phlogiston * Some metal calxes turn to metals when heated with charcoal because the phlogiston from the charcoal restores the phlogiston in the metal
No, it was not. The phenomena explained by the theory are now known to be a result of oxidation, and phlogiston does not exist.
because it changed their mind to belive that phlogiston is in flammable things.
a combustible material is made up of 2 parts: the calx and phlogiston when a substance burnt the phlogiston into air and calx(ash) left behind so there are no good points of this theory
Phlogiston is a hypothetical substance which at one time was thought to be the basis of combustion, but which is now known to be fictitious. It is not an element.
There was no evidence until at least 2 yrs into the work of the phlogiston theory
It is a process that involves oxygen. The phlogiston theory has been disprooven for a long time.
The facts, as they stand, are these: every creature, when respiring, releases phlogiston. In fact, respiration is simply to be considered a form of combustion. Anything that can burn contains phlogiston. Substances, when burnt, release this weightless, invisible substance - an element of their being, their composition - the phlogiston. The phlogiston is always in need of somewhere to go. Such as, air is best for the phlogiston. Air can absorb it. Taking this mode of thinking to its furthest logical conclusion we can only state that the reason creatures "suffocate" is because there is nowhere for the phlogiston to go. When air was removed from around a living creature then there is nowhere for the phlogiston to go and so respiration would cease and the creature dies.