No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.
No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.
No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.
No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.
No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.
No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.
No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.
No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.
No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.
No one elected poor people to any office in ancient Rome. Elections were expensive and a candidate had to have either his own cash or the cash backing of his supporters to pay for all the "giveaways" necessary for him to get the attention of the voters. A poor person simply did not have the connections, both financial and familial, to be a candidate for anything.
plebians
the PATRICIANS. the poor, common people were the PLEBIANS.
It affects the all of ancient rome because they are poor
well i dont know me and my partner are doing a rome project in the 6th grade and i need this question answered or we are screwed if you want to learn about ancient roman slaves look at these sites http://library.thinkquest.org/26602/entertainment.htm http://www.hadrians.com/rome/romans/daily_life/roman_slaves.html They were treated terribly! They were auctioned off and fought to the death. If they were lucky. Otherwise, they had to work in dangerous situations on high mountains and cliffs. If they misbehaved, they got a lashing and were starved until they died! (If you want to learn more watch 'Spartacus')
The subara were the poor area of Rome or the slums
The apartments that were part of huge buildings were called insolae
They lived in a box and ate children, similar to Mike Tyson
Yes, the poor people would work for or be slaves for the rich, the poor people were the plebeians and the rich were called the patricians; the equestrians was another of the classes.
Politically they relied on each other when they were challenged by the leaders of the poor people.
Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.Poor people in ancient Rome were generally called by their names just as rich people were called by their names. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the poor were called plebeians (except at the beginning of the city) as there were many wealthy plebeians as well as wealthy people of other classes.
At first the poor people in Rome were called Plebeians. When the city expanded, they were the Proletariat.
Yes, but not too far. Rome, from the time of the aedileship of Marcus Agrippa, had numerous fountains and water outlets for all the population.