Galileo Galilei
Acceleration of a falling object is directly proportional tothe force of gravity in the object's location.
false
The kinetic energy of a falling object is directly proportional to the distance it falls.But the distance is not directly proportional to the time in fall, so the KE is not directly proportionalto the time either.
an object free falling would continue to gain speed until met by a balanced force i.e. the ground
If you meant to say mass instead of weight, the acceleration of an object is inversely proportional to mass, because F=ma. However for falling objects where acceleration is equal to gravity, the weight is not a variable.
A proportional model of a three dimensional object is an scale model.
The answer is 91 ft, of course!
An object's density is inversely proportional to the object's volume. As the volume increases the density decreases, and vice versa.
An object's density is inversely proportional to the object's volume. As the volume increases the density decreases, and vice versa.
A falling object.A falling object.A falling object.A falling object.
Yes
It reduces the acceleration of the falling object due to friction.