Want this question answered?
After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.After the king had been expelled, Rome was ruled by the form of government called a republic in which the people themselves elected their leaders for a limited amount of time.
The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.The Roman republic was a democracy in which the government leaders were elected by the people to speak for them and to rule them. The Etruscan rule was that of a monarchy in which one man ruled and his word was law no matter what the people wanted.
A republic is a form of government in which power comes from the people. This form of government is ruled by elected leaders.
A rule by the people is a term used to describe a type of government in which the people choose their leaders, often called democracy.
leaders arent as meanies
Maybe it is the government or the leaders of the capital
rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights must also be guaranteed by the states
from textbook: Confucius and his followers believed that a good government depended on having wise leaders who ruled to benefit the people.
the yellow river was ruled by the shung king, gods, and military leaders
Yes, unfortunately it is.
A theocracy is technically a government ruled by God, and his authorities (the religious leaders) interpreting his word and administrating it for him.An ecclesiocracy is a government in which religious leaders assume a leading role in the state, but do not claim that they are speaking for God.
A theocracy is technically a government ruled by God, and his authorities (the religious leaders) interpreting his word and administrating it for him.An ecclesiocracy is a government in which religious leaders assume a leading role in the state, but do not claim that they are speaking for God.