answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

He was a slave whose owner had taken him to live in a free state for a time, before they returned to slave country.

When his owner died, he was left, as property, to the dead man's family. Scott tried to sue for his freedom on the 'Once free, always free' principle, but was told he should have applied while he was living on free soil.

He appealed against this judgment, but the local judges had never dealt with this kind of application before, and it ended up in the Supreme Court.

This court, under the elderly Chief Justice, Roger Taney, delivered an astonishing verdict - that slavery was legal in every state of the Union, because the Founding Fathers had declared that a man's property (including his slaves) was sacred.

This divided the nation even more deeply, and brought war closer.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

He didn't. John Sanford won the case when Chief Justice Roger Taney stated slaves were property under the Fifth Amendment "Takings Clause," not citizens of any state or the United States. The Court's decision upheld the practice of slavery.

After the case was over, Dred Scott and his family were transferred to Taylor Blow, son of Scott's original "owner." Blow legally emancipated the family by manumission (a court procedure).

Case Citation:

Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

dred scott brought up the case if african americans and descendents of slaves were protected by the constitution. the court ruled that anyone of african american descent and slaves were not us citizens and not protected by the constitution. this case was bound to fail because dred scott was african american and at the time not even a person so there was no reason for the court to support him. saves didnt have any rights, they had just about as much rights as a door and couldn't do any thing and were seen as property.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Dred Scott was a slave. When his owner moved to a free state and died, Scott argued that he should be free. He lost the case.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did Dred Scott win the US Supreme Court case?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What slave was denied freedom in a supreme court case?

The slave's name was Dred Scott


What year was Dred Scott ruled a slave by the Supreme Court?

The Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sanford did not decide if Dred Scott was a slave or not, but that slaves (and their descendants) could not be counted as US citizens and had no right to sue in court.


Where was the dred Scott case held?

in the Washington D.C. Supreme Court


What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case?

That Scott had no right to argue in court


Who was the slave who sued for his freedom in the Supreme Court was?

Dred Scott


What city did the Supreme Court neet to decide the Dred Scott v Sanford case?

The Supreme Court met in Washington, D.C. when it decided the Dred Scott case. It has met in Washington for every case since February 1801.


Where did the first case of dred Scott take place?

supreme court of Missouri


What supreme court divided the nation even more?

The Dred Scott case!!


What did the Supreme Court rule in the Dred Scott case?

The ruling in the Dred Scott case allowed slave owners to take their slaves with them into the Western territories of the United States.


What did the supreme. court rule in the dred Scott case?

The ruling in the Dred Scott case allowed slave owners to take their slaves with them into the Western territories of the United States.


How many people in the supreme court had slaves during the dred Scott case?

none


What supreme court decision divided the nationall even more?

Dred Scott case