Dogs are closely related to the wolves. In fact, they are the same species.
Wolves are ancestors of Dogs
No. None of your forbears were dogs.
Dogs and wolves have a more recent common ancestor.
Cats and dogs have a common ancestor that is more recent than the common ancestor of cats and hamsters.
All living things have ancestors.
Crocodiles and birds share a common ancestor. This can be seen by comparing the internal anatomy of the two. Dogs and Dolphins also have a common ancestor. Their skeletons again are both distinctly mammillian. The ancestor of dogs and dolphins and the ancestor of birds and crocodiles will again share a common ancestor, but you will need to go much further back. I am not sure of the timescales but we are talking tens to hundreds of million years.
sigh, dogs come from wolves. they are in the same family, canidae, so wolves ARE dogs ancestor, so stop killing them, they made mans best friend
Birds and dogs and humans share some DNA because the come from a common ancestor.
Wolves did. Dogs diverged from the ancestor Wolves.
Mostly grey and timber wolves.
Of course. Every living thing has a common ancestor. Humans and flies are both in the animalia kingdom.
The evidence that all living things have a common ancestor is that the embryo of almost all animals resemble each other in its most early stage.
No, not of all living creatures. She is the ancestor of all humans, however.
Yes. If you go back far enough, all life on Earth shares a common ancestor.
They are tameable and less viscous
principle that all living things have a commmon ancestor
That seems very likely since everything is interelated.
Isn't a male meerkat called a dog since the meerkat shares a common ancestor with the domestic dogs and the wild cats? Dogs, cats, bears, hyenas and mongooses, including the meerkat share a common ancestor: the extinct miacis.
Dolphins are descendants of land-living mammals called Pakicetus.
Yes, if you go back far enough.
Dogs and insects both have apendages used for moving around, observing this similarity people use the same name to deceive all of them, legs. However to be homologous they must have been inherited by a shares ancestor (common ancestor). Going back in time from the dogs this is an ancestral creature earlier than the earliest vertabrates, before the bony fishes. Considering this it is easy to imagine these distantly related organisms (dogs and fish) did not both inherit the characteristic of having legs from a common ancestor. Therefor legs of dogs and insects are analogous, not homologous.
There is no particular name for it, since we do not know exactly what that organism was. We do, however, have a general name LUCA, which stands for Last Universal Common Ancestor, meaning the last living thing that was the ancestor of all life on Earth.
Yes there are many wild dogs living in the wild for example the African wild dog
no dogs give brith to living animals
The common ancestor of Homo with the other living Great Apes must be even older.
How do you get 1000000 robux for free?
Asked By Wiki User
What is the difference between margin and margin?
Asked By Wiki User
Is gold a good investment or will the price of it go down?
Asked By Wiki User
Who is a dog's living ancestor?
Asked By Wiki User
What classification instrument of tongatong?
Asked By Wiki User
How does the newsprint vary in the three divisions of the newspaper?
Asked By Wiki User
Why did the trout so fascinate Julia?
Asked By Wiki User
Is Duranice Pace husband dead?
Asked By Wiki User