If you are completely stopped, the person behind you will be at fault for BOTH cars since they didn't allow themselves enough time and space to stop safely.
If you mean that someone was starting to merge into traffic and then they stopped and you rear-ended them, you would be at fault. If the person merging into traffic hit someone, the merger would be at fault because they failed to yield to oncoming traffic. These are typical scenarios. Other scenarios or circumstances may effect the outcome.
The person behind. I was a claim adjuster and we lost a case in arbitration. person ahead had no brake lights at night and stopped. Our insured was ticketed for failure to maintain a safe distance. right or wrong, precedent dictates regardless of the conditions, the person behind has the greater duty.
next to is when you are to the left or right of a person, behind someone is when your back is facing them
if their shadow is in front of him
EXAMPLE: someone is standing behind you though you cant see them who are they? you answer= the person you distrust. ---- == == == == EXAMPLE: someone is standing behind you though you cant see them who are they? you answer= the person you distrust. ---- == == == ==
The person who ran into you No contest
The term for someone who does this specifically is "two-faced"
The culture or ansestors behind that person
Use perspective. Make sure the person behind is smaller. Make sure they are on the same plane.
You can stop someone by sending message only by blocking that person from your Facebook. Messages will only be stopped when you block the person who is stalking.
The culture or ansestors behind that person
Stand behind person, and press on stomach